3dprinting

3dprinting@lists.fedoraproject.org

59 discussions

New member self-introduction
by Lumir Balhar 22 Nov '17

22 Nov '17

Hello. My name is Lumír Balhar and I am a member of Python maintenance team in Red Hat. I am a Fedora packager and my main responsibility is to help to upstream projects with supporting Python 2 and Python 3 in one codebase. I am currently waiting for my first 3D printer which I should get before Christmas and I am playing with tools around in the meantime. Therefore, I don't have much experience with 3D print but it'll be better hopefuly soon. I would like to help with packaging, testing, propagation etc. Feel free to reach me on email or IRC. Have a nice day. Lumír

2 2

Latest Qt 5 update breaks Cura
by Miro Hrončok 31 Oct '17

31 Oct '17

I find out that the latest Qt 5 update in Fedora 27 (5.9.2) breaks Cura, one of the 3D printing apps. I've reported the problem [0] (it contains more links). However, I have no idea how to debug this or fix it, so if anyone here is a Qt mastermind, please help. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507859 Thank you, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 0

Cura 2.7.0
by Miro Hrončok 01 Sep '17

01 Sep '17

Cura 2.7.0 is in updates testing for Fedora 27: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-849317276e (That update includes a list of changes.) Also available in Copr for F26 and F25: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/cura-modern/ Please go ahead and test it. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 0

MeshLab needs a rebuild and/or a maintainer
by Miro Hrončok 18 Jul '17

18 Jul '17

Hi, there is a problem with MeshLab in Fedora 26 - it is not installable due to broken dependencies and rebuild is not trivial. MeshLab needs to be fixed and preferably also updated, but the current maintainer seems not to respond. If anyone has time to fix the FTBFS or to update MeshLab, it would be very appreciated. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439673 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161846 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 0

Package review needed
by Miro Hrončok 11 Jul '17

11 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466013 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 0

License for data files about 3D printing materials
by Miro Hrončok 28 Jun '17

28 Jun '17

Hi, there is a repository with data about 3D printing materials [1] that I'd like to package as a soft dependency for the Cura package. It didn't have any license information and Gregor Riepl (I believe from Debian) opened an issue asking for it [2]. The authors of the data clam that the data cannot has its license and simply is (by default) accessible to all freely. After a long discussion, they went with a solution: Add a LICENSE file that they believe is only for the CMakeLists.txt file in that repository, but tell me I can believe it belongs to the whole repo and everybody is supposed to be happy [3]. However, when adding the LICENSE file (with CC0), this is the commit message [4]: > This license only applies to the CMakeLists.txt file since that is the > only creative expression in here, according to one of our IP guys. (They cannot make it easy, can they?) Clearly, I was informed this LICENSE *does not apply* for the data files. However, I was informed publicly in that issue that: > All files in this repository can be seen as part of the public domain. > Anyone is free to use them in any way they want. Clearly, the authors / copyright holders: 1. want the content to be redistributed freely 2. do not think that content is copyrightable The intent here is clear: Public Domain. However the information is quite hard to grasp. I cannot, in my best effort, include that LICENSE file and pretend it belongs to everything in that repository (ignoring the commit message). Should I print the issue comments log to a PDF (or save as HTML) and include that in the package %license as well? Thanks for any way out of this. [1] https://github.com/Ultimaker/fdm_materials [2] https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779 [3] https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/1779#issuecomment-311312453 [4] https://github.com/Ultimaker/fdm_materials/commit/761804bc77cd7258b86342e08… -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

2 1

Packaging modern version of Cura for Fedora 26
by Miro Hrončok 09 May '17

09 May '17

Hi. Several people asked me to update Cura to more recent version (2.3.x). Cura went with a (complete?) rewrite, change of technologies and dependencies quite some time ago. Debian is already packaging the new version [0]. Because of update policies and Python 3 protobuf bindings needed, I'm talking only about Fedora 26 here. Dependencies roadmap is described on Etherpad [1]. I don't have much time, so I'm not sure if I can make it alone til Fedora 26. I would appreciate some help. All you need to do is to put your FAS username to the list of dependencies and then try to package that thing and report back here on the mailing list or/and in the Etherpad. Thanks for any help. [0] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/3dprinter-general/Week-of-Mon-2016… [1] https://etherpad.gnome.org/p/cura-modern -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 2

Missing save on Cura
by Fulko Hew 25 Mar '17

25 Mar '17

Running on F25, I installed cura. (15.04.4-5.fc25) (I have tried slic3r and haven't figured out how to tune it to get usable gcode.) (And I can't figure out skeinforge.) On cura, the button the docs tell me is the 'save' button' doesn't have an icon and isn't clickable. And the 'Save Gcode' menu item doesn't appear to do anything either. What am I missing ? TIA Fulko

2 2

Slic3r Prusa Edition in Fedora
by Miro Hrončok 01 Mar '17

01 Mar '17

Hi, we now have Slic3r Prusa Edition in Fedora. It's in rawhide and 26. For 25 and 24, it's on it's way to testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e81d02a8e7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a1a496d043 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 0

Slic3r Prusa Edition Review Request
by Miro Hrončok 19 Dec '16

19 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405714 I'd appreciate if anyone would do the review. Thanks -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

3dprinting