Re: GPS is around the corner

[Björn Persson]

Pavel Zhukov wrote:
>  Maxim Reznik <reznikmm(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:
>  > 2017-04-21 11:16 GMT+03:00 Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov(a)redhat.com&gt;:  
>  >> Do gprbuild-libgpr and gprbuild-libgpr-devel sound good?
>  >
>  > I guess libgpr and libgpr-devel could be even better. It seems this
>  > is a separate piece of software, even if gprbuild is the only user
>  > of it now and this packaged inside of gprbuild tar.gz.  
>  The problem is we will have to build two packages (gprbuild and
>  libgpr) from the same sources so build it twice and ship parts of
>  them in different RPMs. If it's part of gprbuild it will have
>  gprbuild- name. But it's possible to use "Provides: libgpr" to make
>  things more clear. 
You only need to add "-n".

In gcc.spec for example, you can find these lines:

%package gnat

%description gnat

%package -n libgnat

%description -n libgnat

This produces subpackages named "gcc-gnat" and "libgnat". Because of
"-n" it's not "gcc-libgnat".

And I agree that "libgpr" would be better than "gprbuild-libgpr".

>  And one more issue is gtkada.gpr doesn't contain version in it.
>  Gnatcoll configure expects to see
>            Version := "2016";
>  there. 
The current gnatcoll master branch in Dist-Git, with with_gtkada
changed to 1, builds fine for me in F25, and with
GtkAda3-devel-3.14.2-3.fc27 it builds fine in Rawhide too. Can you
provide a test case that fails because the version number isn't there?

Björn