On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Onyeibo Oku <twohotis(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:17 -0500, "inode0" <inode0(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Viji V Nair <viji(a)fedoraproject.org>
> > Hi
> > I wanted to be an ambassador (I was one of them and removed as a part
> > of "India Cleanup"), but my mentor from India needs 6 months to
> > promote me, according to him my works are not official. -
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Viji_V_Nair
Oh I see, you have links to personal community builds (packages) on your
fedora wiki page. And as you stated there, they're not directly related
to fedora. Is this right? Is it not suggestive and confusing? ... you
may have sincere motives but lines like that can mean anything to
anybody. They may be less misleading on your personal website or your
Agreed, those are not directly related to fedora. Please understand
that most of the people using fedora runs "many community stuff" on
top of it, not only fedora shipped packages. I know many organizations
chose ubuntu because they ships may apps which fedora does not, eg
I am here trying to promote fedora with some additional community
stuff, like PVFS2, reiser4 etc. We are all here to promote FOSS and
Fedora, I believe.
> > Because of these new rules my requested to other groups like
> > "Marketing Group" etc are also on hold.
> > I am disappointed....
Maybe this thread should be discussed in-depth on an agreed freenode
channel (and at an agreed time). Its beginning to acquire some
share/toll percentage on the mailing list.
- Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
unladen european swallow
ambassadors mailing list