-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Ugolini wrote:
The proposal want to give active ambassador the recognition for this
work, and the simplest way to award a work is to recognize what was
done, in this sense, giving the status of active ambassador will grant
them such recognition.
I would suggest that instead of flipping the reward system by making a
system of active and passive, let's just reward the Ambassadors who are
"active" (as per the discussion definition) more often. It is not that
the passive ones doing the project (ie Fedora) harm - they are just not
functioning at optimal capacity.
Rewarding does have positive incentives.
:Sankarshan
- --
You see things; and you say 'Why?';
But I dream things that never were;
and I say 'Why not?' - George Bernard Shaw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGFdSKXQZpNTcrCzMRAhxiAKDCVGHt1aJ8QqGNUfYiXi0Ok7GQUgCgx9Hz
8XNkzGcuRDZwAG6k/T22eZ0=
=FS3V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----