Warning potentially horrible idea follows:Would it make sense to try split the Swag trac in Pagure so that we can stay as open as possible yet still shield people's private data (which I believe is the biggest concern)? An idea, possibly a horrible one is:
1. Ambassador SWAG and other requests are handled inan open Pagure instance. Once the request is approved, it is set to either closed or waiting (not sure I have a preference).
2. When the purchase is completed a new ticket is opened privately in fedora-budget. This is the ticket where receipts and payment information are placed. This is closed to just the budget folks (FCAIC, treasurers, card holders). The reimbursement/payment is processed. This ticket includes the reference to the public ticket opened in #1.3. The public ticket, if not already closed is closed with an update stating the total paid.
It creates an extra step for the payment processors (#3), but I don't think it represents a lot of work (there is a link in #2). This also allows us to more easily track receipts in a closed way while being very open about the approval process. That is a HUGE win for audit purposes.
An added bonus is that at times when meeting cards run out of credit limit or we reach the end of the FY, all payers are in the same place and can jump in to help each other out more easily.WDYT?regards,bex--Robert Mayr(robyduck)_______________________________________________ ambassadors mailing list -- ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ambassadors-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
ambassadors mailing list -- ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ambassadors-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org