Hi All,
I am exactely with Sankarshan' opinion
In my view the problem is to get an view of active and passive
Ambassadors to despatch tasks or get help, to handle events for example.
I think time is the important factor as far as I ve followed up this
discussion. I think pressure is not the way to get these people active.
Sorry, got less sleep in the last view days so my English is becoming
worse. :) hope you get the point
Do not kick Ambassadors and waste strength..
AndreasR(a)fedoraproject.org
feel free to correct/contact me if I miss the point of this discussion
contact:
Yahoo:bop80medic
;) msn:Andreas.Rau@infor.de #that's the part with the joke - my five
cents in this discussion
Kind regards,
ANdi
Am Freitag, den 06.04.2007, 10:33 +0530 schrieb Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Ugolini wrote:
> The proposal want to give active ambassador the recognition for this
> work, and the simplest way to award a work is to recognize what was
> done, in this sense, giving the status of active ambassador will grant
> them such recognition.
I would suggest that instead of flipping the reward system by making a
system of active and passive, let's just reward the Ambassadors who are
"active" (as per the discussion definition) more often. It is not that
the passive ones doing the project (ie Fedora) harm - they are just not
functioning at optimal capacity.
Rewarding does have positive incentives.
:Sankarshan
- --
You see things; and you say 'Why?';
But I dream things that never were;
and I say 'Why not?' - George Bernard Shaw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGFdSKXQZpNTcrCzMRAhxiAKDCVGHt1aJ8QqGNUfYiXi0Ok7GQUgCgx9Hz
8XNkzGcuRDZwAG6k/T22eZ0=
=FS3V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list