I am not meant or suppose to expose any of post to this sensitive thread
but could not stop myself in expressing my opinion:
1) Fedora organogram and policy must be in Public (public refers to the
Ambassadors in Fedora premises.)
2) Election is the part of the responsibility to lead with honor with
respecting the Fedora community and its by-laws rather than go beyond
community voting and their respective decision. If there is any problem
persist then only the solution to be : "to discuss with the responsible
persons/legends of fedora/fedora chair/or Red hat appointed person" to
avoid all the detailing to the community and hide the internal affairs of
the top level to avoid the misinterpretation. Only final decision made by
the superiors or logistics must be to the meeting or thread(i.e. call for
election with reasons or call for petition[though the term is very
sensitive to my point of view], or any other term related with the board or
supreme part of the Fedora community).
3) The Fedora-By-Laws is quite clear though its few in the following link,
but it should be strictly maintained and followed with the continuous
supervision.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Cwickert/Proposed_FAmSCo_election_rules
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Cwickert/FAmSCo_election_rules_analysis
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAmSCo
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/ht...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAmSCo_elections#Election_2011
4) To take initiative to update the policy on timely fashion.
5) Not to involve the whole community in an uncertain decision or without
any prior proper information.
- Rashadul