I am not meant or suppose to expose any of post to this sensitive thread but could not stop myself in expressing my opinion:
1) Fedora organogram and policy must be in Public (public refers to the Ambassadors in Fedora premises.)
2) Election is the part of the responsibility to lead with honor with respecting the Fedora community and its by-laws rather than go beyond community voting and their respective decision. If there is any problem persist then only the solution to be : "to discuss with the responsible persons/legends of fedora/fedora chair/or Red hat appointed person" to avoid all the detailing to the community and hide the internal affairs of the top level to avoid the misinterpretation. Only final decision made by the superiors or logistics must be to the meeting or thread(i.e. call for election with reasons or call for petition[though the term is very sensitive to my point of view], or any other term related with the board or supreme part of the Fedora community).
3) The Fedora-By-Laws is quite clear though its few in the following link, but it should be strictly maintained and followed with the continuous supervision.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Cwickert/Proposed_FAmSCo_election_rules
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Cwickert/FAmSCo_election_rules_analysis
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAmSCo
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Fedora_Elections_Guide/index.html
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAmSCo_elections#Election_2011
4) To take initiative to update the policy on timely fashion.
5) Not to involve the whole community in an uncertain decision or without any prior proper information.
- Rashadul