Hi again,
>
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=fama.git;a=blob_plain;f=stats/ambassad...
>
> and we could no longer assure the quality of new candidates.
>
> We trust Ambassdars with ressources - and personal trust is nothing that
> you can put in guidelines and rulebooks. Same is for new Mentors!
Yes, but that also means that some candidates e.g. I personally
wouldn't have rejected, have been.
and just another side-note: I see much more in mentoring, than
deciding who fulfils the needs of being an ambassadors (and that's
what I have discussed with Mathieu at FUDCon EMEA and is the also part
of the first sentence on the Ambassadors Mentor page:
"Mentors are experienced ambassadors who can help you quickly become
acclimated to the work expected of Ambassadors"
e.g. from my personal experience I felt quiet lost after joining
Ambassadors (in days where you Joerg was the only one who managed the
whole process). I got good contacts to Christoph who then helped me
somewhat to get started, which saved me somewhat.
I know the process has been improved somewhat, so why not lift it up
one level (to how to become a Mentor)?
--
Greets
Marcus