-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Frank Murphy  wrote:

>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2008-September/msg00231.html
> "clearly the first memo from Paul outlined a security breach"
>
> Which as the thread goes, I did not get that assertion, my assumption
> was that not enough, info was given out. You as in the community, does
> not want to create a panic, but silence\ lack of communication can be a
> panic in itself.
>

Clearly the infrastructure and security team need to have a proper set
of rules for use in crisis management.  More so, when the structure of
the crisis can be predicted by the book.
Just saying that it is necessary to 'communicate more' is not enough.


Best

A. Mani


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iD8DBQFIyEhsoIK4BlImohYRAuCmAKCMp2GUh8vcGLU+NHa/JIJlo0vnJACgoYs3
xTk76mJscwE+PBu+ASltXxU=
=zkzW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
A. Mani
Member, Cal. Math. Soc

--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list