I think we should focus on the real problem. How is the Red Hat Community Architecture team unable to co-operate with FAmSCo so that we need an other group for that? Is it that serious?

Do we need a middleman group?

Apart from the fact that seperating into 2 groups that do the same thing is bad, as Maria Leandro said, the non-Ambassador group that would help funding events organized by non-Ambassadors, how could it be better than FAmSCo?

I think FAmSCo and the Ambassadors group is capable to manage all kinds of events. If a packager wants to make an event, he should become an Ambassador.

--
Konstantinos Antonakoglou
PGP key: 0xC9E2E16B
<anton.cost@gmail.com>
constanton @ freenode