Neville,
In a country with few members, a near country could monitor their actions
provide guidelines for they. As a worldwide program, the core doesn't know
how local users in each country works, but near country does, or should do.
"Or when the group members have better communication to fedora at large that
among themselves?"
Why not create this communication for all group members? Off course USA will
talk directly with Fedora Core, but other groups should create this mature
local group to be stronger and accomplish bigger goals.
Cheers,
Rodrigo Menezes
-----Mensagem original-----
De: fedora-ambassadors-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-ambassadors-list-bounces@redhat.com] Em nome de Neville A.
Cross
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2009 15:21
Para: fedora-ambassadors-list(a)redhat.com
Assunto: Re: [Ambassadors] inactive ambassadors, a proposed solution
2009/2/19 Shambo Bose <shambo.linux(a)gmail.com>:
+1 to local groups to control local Ambassador membership.
Shambo Bose
That may work for mature groups. What happen with those countries that
only have one ambassador. Or when the group members have better
communication to fedora at large that among thenselves?
But sure, if the is the local group can handle it, better leave at local
level.
--
Neville
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Yn1v
Linux User # 473217
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Check:
http://www.clickmanagua.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
__________________________________________________
Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/