On Tuesday 15 December 2009 17:04:10 Mel Chua wrote:
> On 12/15/2009 08:49 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:31:23AM -0500, David Ramsey wrote:
> >> There is some entry for Fedora Electronic Lab, eh? I do not
> >> understand this for my presentation.
> > I'll revert that edit.
i think the better way would be to explain what relevance FEL has, to David.
> Thanks for the catch, David - and for the edit, Paul. Copying the
> Marketing list on this.
>
> The Talking Points that the Marketing team produces for our release
> deliverables are talking points for the Desktop (GNOME) Spin.
while some the arguments for spins maybe are valid and the work on the spins
pages is absolut great, i do not think that marketing has understand the
relevance of fel - this is not just a spin, it is something really unique in
Fedora - no other Distribution has something mature like this related to
electronics. Chitlesh and the fel gang could go the easy way by just making a
remix with strange licences - but they work hard with the electronics
industrie to convince them to change licences to have it in fel or even become
contributors. It has also Ambassador Relevance - i could hire some of the most
brilliant contributors through fel, they came as normal software-, computer
enthusiasts and were more than happy i introduced fel to them - so i suggest
put it back - this has general relevance in some parts of the world!
cu Joerg
--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list