Il 30/gen/2017 03:49 AM, "William Moreno" <williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com> ha
El 29/1/2017 7:11 p. m., "Itamar Reis Peixoto" <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br>
23:27:45 <juon> +1 to Brasil
FAS ??? Not counted
Votation was closed
00:07:36 <rigobersol> brasil +1
fas rigobersol cla_fpca OK
Neville, I am sorry but Panamá didn't won the voting because rigobersol and
Juon vote was not counted for Brazil, anyway I don't think repeating a
FUDCon in Panamá is better for the Project instead of having a FUDCon in
Paraguay that never received one,
Can you provide us the Juon fas information?, we request people who
attendees the meeting to identify they selves with .fas FASUSERNAME , also
most people in the meeting have theirs nicks registered in freenode so you
can trust in the identity of the person begin the Nick, with rigobersol
vote there is a draw, anyway we need to wait the council opinion.
ambassadors mailing list -- ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ambassadors-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Well I think we/you are going in the wrong direction, it seems to me you
are fighting one against the other when you have the same goal at the end.
I saw the bids just a few days ago and am surprised you already voted,
because the bids have both pros and cons.
I would consider instead to extend the deadline (remember we don't have a
budget yet set) and try to find more arguments why the FUDCon should be in
Panama or in Brazil. People should not vote just for winning a bit, they
should vote having enough informations about the bids.
Organizing a FUDCon is not simple and you need a lot of people and a good
strategy to be successful.
So please, before you fight within your region about valid or invalid
votes, think about the final goal and extend your deadline a bit. If you
like I'm sure jkurik can setup a voting session, although the Region's
proposals to the Council never needed that.
My two cents.