On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:16:38AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Robert Mayr wrote:
> > As you can realise, this is has been a very unique situation. I don't
> > recall having dealt with something similar in the past.
>
> well, given an essential mistake happened during the election process
> (a non-ambassador got elected for FAmSCo), it would make sense from my
> point of view to have simply a complete reelection of FAmSCo.
Given, that nobody (minus two or three) is really comfortable with the
situation, a full re-election would be the cleanest way to escape it.
It would also be the fairest way for all candidates.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge <mrunge@matthias-runge.de>
_______________________________________________
ambassadors mailing list -- ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ambassadors-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org