mailga added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Usually I'm not for a plenty of mentors, I thinks it's a tricky job and it's worth to be deep examined. Of course a Region ([rules say:] (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mentors/NewMentors)) can nominate a Mentor, and in that sense FAmSCo can't do nothing. I still don't see the mentor's approval in the FAmA ticket ("The nominating process starts with a ticket in the FAmA trac, where mentors get asked to give their +1/0/-1 to the nomination. As per lazy consensus, all votes with 0 or -1 have to be explained with a reason. Once the nominee gets at least 3 +1s, his nomination counts as mentor-approved.") so I can't give my +1 so far.
Furthermore I have two/three things to say here:
1) [in the meeting] (https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2017-05-06/fedora-latam.2...) Alexove spoke in spanish; this is not the first time I say I'd like to let people read English (even if a bad English like mine) instead of other languages, although, as Italian, I can understand Spanish. If Alexove can't grant he will speak English in the Fedora official meetings I can't give my approval to him (who's also a nominee for a FAmSCo seat).
2) I trust in the Regions so if one of them reach the quorum for pushing a candidate, I don't have anything to say.
3) In the past we have been not really open to new entrants in mentorship; maybe with the last changes we could get more from this activity.
For me, is a -1 so far, waiting for the Mentors vote and an assurance he will speak English in the official Fedora channels.
Thanks.
Gabri ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/433