Yeah... I see things work differently in the upstream ;-)
And I like this idea of going after the dark-side! lets get them!
On 25 February 2015 at 08:59, Peter Czanik <pczanik(a)fang.fa.gau.hu> wrote:
Hi,
On 02/25/2015 08:39 AM, Cesar Pinto wrote:
I find myself agreeing with Kushal here.
Being an ambassador implies a sense of "special loyalty" to the
distribution and playing a role as an advocate for the overall success of
the project.
For one of "our" advocates to also be an advocate for our biggest
competitors might put the loyalty aspect into question.
But then again, maybe I am wrong?
I'm both a Fedora and openSUSE ambassador. When I'm representing Fedora, I
advocate Fedora. When I wear my openSUSE hat I advocate openSUSE. When I'm
not officially representing Fedora or openSUSE at an event, I route people
to the distro which covers their needs best (including Fedora (and
related), openSUSE (and related), Debian (&derivatives), Gentoo and even
FreeBSD).
It's more important to convert people from the "dark side" to open source
than to a specific distro which disappoints them as it does not meet their
expectations.
Bye,
Peter Czanik (CzP)
BalaBit IT Security / syslog-ng upstream
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/
https://twitter.com/PCzanik
--
ambassadors mailing list
ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ambassadors