-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/2012 04:08 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Not even using the only numbers is possible to identify the Fedora
> improvements in the time, maybe can do that only with its age.
> Actually i see Fedora 16, 17, 18 too detached by its code names
> (Verne, Beefy Miracle, Spherical Cow respectively), as were for the
> older releases, but i respected this tradition.
>
> Is for this reason that i have suggested the Roman Emperors names
> for Fedora. :)
The idea of having an overarching theme is fine (though a bit
constraining if we don't limit it to, say, a two-year cycle) -- but
Roman Emperors? There are so many bad apples among them, and if you
skip those (e.g. Nero, Caligula) you'd no longer have the "is a
successor of" analogy.
Regards,
- --
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma@fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus@jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus@irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPsyzUAAoJEEr1VKujapN6cR4H/3E0GZDZL9dAlra3XSQwdwoS
DDF4GPBo88cscsgoIzKGhZUco9WBJ5CIWR2oeWN+zftd6V75WrhmOnHi+gVrW0tI
LOdHvxdSREmR5LXqP5TxYvFAyTMJLilqFJRvG0p5DyXiKs4RO1LzjRPT03HJty2a
ef+F8Na1D7iMXPk/EsF0ru9FwzRbMan1RvY2W7Kb2k+Wrtc/8O+y4bIL2q1ec+D1
xMNqvWqWhsPCTzpvBq0eN+7E+DRU0CVrs1mpOEIzKFvN03o3dHkBZZkiuypq2Uja
6R/x3SMOcidhw3/SEGBafTmfIoq0YOxjR2utCLLTivzAI9jIfjIBFBq9k3TVbBQ=
=UPqG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----