On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:25 AM, S.Kemter <sirko.kemter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
2016-04-07 20:43 GMT+07:00 Zamir SUN <zsun(a)fedoraproject.org>:
>
>
>
> On 04/07/2016 09:31 PM, Joerg Simon wrote:
>>
>> Am 07.04.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Gerold:
>>>
>>> shouldn't that been taken from the APAC budget and not from EMEA, in
>>> general? Thought EMEA budget is still limited and also without a proper
>>> planning für that fiscal year
>>
>>
> IIRC, sponsorship for APAC people to FLOCK is taken from APAC budget. So I
> think sending EMEA people into events in India(or any other parts out of
> EMEA) should be from EMEA budget.
The amount in the budget plan of APAC is the same as EMEA has. As on Flock
mostly only speakers get sponsored, EMEA started to reserve a small sum of
their budget to help good contributors to go there and since last year APAC
does the same.
When kital travels to India, it helps the community in India growing, so the
effect is on APAC side note EMEA. Why comes there always from APAC side,
this eeh this is ours. EMEA never showed this kind of behavior, they helped
very fast Tenzen Shokden eg with booking his flight ticket to travel to APAC
FAD or they never came, when LGM was in Europe eh LATAM pay for tatica, she
is from your region.
There is no ours and yours there is FEDORAs budget in general.
@decause
I will open a ticket for FAmSCo, we definitely should find a solution for
this kind of over-regional travel to ending such discussions, who pays for
it.
Thanks gnokii for taking this. Please keep us posted once there is a
ticket for discussion.
My opinion is that for the immediate future we should stick to the old
way. But for future planning I'd suggest a separate non-regional
budget is established to take care of such inter-region
collaborations.
--
Regards,
Alick