Sorry, but first to say such things read all the 80s or more posts. I
never say kick of people. If you have read the last proposal we talked
only to mark active, people who work, no more. So ....
Justin M Bisted ha scritto:
Hey thanks Thomas for stepping in on this
You know we all know this is a big deal and none of use want to be
kicked out but if this is a real issue and fedora really wants to do
this inactive thing then we should figure something out so we all can
figure out what we want to do instead of freeking out
Any thoughts??
Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 4/9/07, Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Francesco Ugolini wrote:
>>
>> > Stay sure, we don't want to "kill" people, we know the
different needs
>> > of each ambassador. We want to shake people that do nothing.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Why do we want to "shake people that do nothing"? What harm do they
do?
>> And what's to say that someone who does nothing today won't be
>> someone who
>> does something vitally important later? And what's your threshhold for
>> "activity" -- somebody says "I'm active"?
>>
>> The *only* effect of *any* inactivity policy will be to announce to
>> people, "we don't want you, go away."
>>
>> My $0.02: once somebody says "I am a Fedora ambassador," then they are
a
>> Fedora ambassador, FOR LIFE. Until (a) they say "no thanks, I'm not an
>> ambassador anymore," or (b) they do something that disgraces Fedora, and
>> FAMSCO drums them out.
>>
>> =====
>>
>> So let me back up and ask a question. What's the *real* goal here?
>>
>> Is the goal to recognize our best ambassadors?
>>
>> Is the goal to know who can be "counted upon" to get stuff done?
>>
>> What are we trying to accomplish with the active/inactive proposal?
>>
>> --g
>>
>> --
>> Greg DeKoenigsberg
>> Community Development Manager
>> Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
>> "To whomsoever much hath been given...
>> ...from him much shall be asked"
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm sorry I was away from this whole discussion.
> It's time for me to step in stop this once for all.
>
> Yes, Greg is *absolutely* correct. This entire discussion is not
> helping our project but tearing us apart. I even noticed some of us
> planning to leave the project because this discussion.
>
> I *urge* you stop this non-productive proposal and I would to hear
> more productive ideas.
> Please consider this is my last call to end this discussion.
>
> Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee Chair
--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list