On Sunday 19 March 2006 17:13, Alex Maier wrote:
On 3/18/06, Pat McKelvey <pmckelvey(a)zoomtown.com> wrote:
> I just saw your comments about ambassadorship in the newsletter. I
> agree completely. I have said so at the last ambassador's meeting on
> the 16 and was loudly ignored. There may be too many competing agendas
> in this situation.
Pat, all--
If you want to bring up a topic in a meeting, please add a schedule
entry on the wiki:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Schedule
You are guaranteed to have your time in the discussion.
But that's only for events.
However, to do justice to folks who already do "un-events,"
let me
mention briefly at least some of such initiatives which are already
well on the way:
Chitlesh Goorah with his Kadischi and Fedora Libraries initiatives
David Nalley promoting Kadischi
Rahul Sundaram and Francesco Ugolini building an interactive tour of
the new release
Rahul Sundaram helping create and publish presentations for Ambassadors
Pablo Barrera and others pursuing their Fedora in the Streets project
finally Thomas Chung and I putting together a video contest to promote
free media format support in Fedora --
Only two of these are ambassador related.
This is just a quick selection of the initiatives that come to mind
--
there are more, just look through the list archives.
...which 99% of is noise and should go to marketing.
I understand your concern that Ambassadors are concentrating on the
event too much, but events is almost like a default option, but all of
us can and should come up with other ways to represent Fedora to the
people out there.
You're confusing "Not events" with "Marketing".
Clair