On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 02:30:41PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
2016-11-04 10:42 GMT+01:00 Joerg Simon
<jsimon(a)fedoraproject.org>:
> Hi Ambassadors,
>
> this is a heads up i just got from Infrastructure regarding retirement
> of TRAC
fedorahosted.org - Ambassador Tools
Hi,
when I raised my concerns about this migration months ago, I was told
that I should file individual bugs against pagure instead. I already
filed some and have a list of ~10 more I need to file. So far only one
bug was fixed, thus I doubt all problems will be resolved by the time
of the migration.
Looking at:
https://pagure.io/pagure/issues?status=Open&author=cwickert
I see 2 bugs that are still open out of 4 and the 2 remaining include one about
doc asking for more inputs and one that I am still unclear on how to reproduce.
I would be interested in your other 10 tickets
The biggest problem I see is that we need per-ticket ACLs. At least
the emea-swag-tracking trac uses the private tickets plugin. I don't
see anything like this in pagure, in fact, developers told me they
have no plans to implement something like this, all authentication
should happen elsewhere.
You're speaking about private ticket and authentication, I am not sure to see
how they relate.
Private tickets is in pagure for a while now, there is even an setting to make
ticket private by default on a project if desired.
Authentication however is using either openid, FAS or local accounts. The pagure
instance on pagure.io uses FAS and that is indeed unlikely to change.
Pierre