Re: [Ambassadors] Fedora EMEA and Trademark Usage

[Rahul Sundaram]

Matt Domsch wrote:
>  On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:57:09PM -0500, Max Spevack wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Gerold Kassube wrote:
> >
> >> It will be a pleasure for us to bring point 3 of your mail to your 
> >> attention. Would you please so kind and define us your wishes what you 
> >> like to have in that report that we can create it or a given template? 
> >> That would be really nice to see how we can please you as you want it 
> >> :-)
> > I recommend that the Fedora Board delegate to me the responsibility of 
> > reporting back on "Fedora's progress in EMEA" frequently, and
> "state of 
> > the Fedora NPO" as part of that report quarterly.
> >
> > I can work with everyone, and put it together in a way that will be 
> > useful for the community, the Fedora Board, and Red Hat all at the same 
> > time.
>  
>  I want the responsibility to lie with the Fedora EMEA NPO, but _they_
>  may delegate to Max to do the actual reporting.  I'm sure Max can
>  craft a useful reporting template to be used not just for EMEA, but
>  elsewhere as may be fitting in the future. 
Also, it would be useful for the report details to be public or atleast 
more information on what is being reported.

Rahul

Fedora EMEA and Trademark Usage

[Max Spevack]

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>  Also, it would be useful for the report details to be public or 
>  atleast more information on what is being reported. 
I would plan for total transparency.

And +1 to Matt's comment.  Make the actual NPO own the responsibility, 
but if they choose to, they can delegate it down to me as the liason 
between that NPO and Fedora/RH.

--Max

Fedora EMEA and Trademark Usage

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Max Spevack wrote:
>  On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  
> > Also, it would be useful for the report details to be public or 
> > atleast more information on what is being reported.
>  
>  I would plan for total transparency.
>   
So do we, other then a board-list anything else is out in the open.

>  And +1 to Matt's comment.  Make the actual NPO own the
> responsibility, 
>  but if they choose to, they can delegate it down to me as the liason 
>  between that NPO and Fedora/RH.
>   
And we'll probably need it, so I appreciate the offer.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

Fedora EMEA and Trademark Usage

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 17:21 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>  Max Spevack wrote:
>  > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  > 
>  >> Also, it would be useful for the report details to be public or 
>  >> atleast more information on what is being reported.
>  > 
>  > I would plan for total transparency. 
>  
>  So do we, other then a board-list anything else is out in the open.
>  
>  > And +1 to Matt's comment.  Make the actual NPO own the responsibility, 
>  > but if they choose to, they can delegate it down to me as the liason 
>  > between that NPO and Fedora/RH.
>  > 
>  
>  And we'll probably need it, so I appreciate the offer. 
I'm very excited about the opportunity Fedora EMEA will have to develop
Fedora's image and footprint in the region.  I highly encourage the
Fedora EMEA group to continue to use Max as a resource, but also remind
them that just as for any other community members, the Fedora Advisory
Board and the Fedora Project Board are here for you as well.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug