Budget information, updates.

[Robyn Bergeron]

Greetings, Ambassadors & FAmSCo folks (yeah, I just cross-posted, sorry!):

The following updates have been a long time in coming, and so I'll 
preface it with the following:

* This will cover as much as possible about the past, the present, and 
the future of the budget. As such, it is a long email, but I wanted to 
get as much information out as possible, and I will continue to give 
updates as I have them.
* Let's keep this mail thread positive and looking happily into the 
future, please :)

I realize that the transparency around the budget and spending has been 
less than optimal for some time now.  I have been working diligently 
towards improving the situation, which brings me to where we are today. 
Which is just that: Improving. :)

First: Budget Management

The Fedora budget for regional support and Fedora events, in the past, 
was managed by the Community Architecture team inside of Red Hat, first 
under Max Spevack, and then under Harish Pillay.  As of a few weeks ago 
(though we were still pending for some time on some close-out/transfer 
information following), the budget has been transferred to a new group 
inside of Red Hat.  The team name is OSAS (Open Source and Standards), 
is managed by Carl Trieloff, and lies within the CTO office (Brian 
Stevens) at Red Hat.

What this means: Effective immediately, CommArch is NO LONGER the point 
of contact for budget-related anything. This includes reimbursements, 
requests of money for FADs, publication of how money was utilized, etc.  
- including anything in the past which may be outstanding at this 
point.  Many of you know Ruth Suehle from her work within Fedora and 
attendance at FUDCons, as well as her writings for opensource.com; she 
has transferred over to the OSAS team, and will be functioning as the 
manager of this budget, with assistance and guidance from myself and Spot.

I would expect in the very near future that Ruth and Carl will both want 
to be added to the FAmSCo list; Ruth is an Ambassador in training and on 
the Ambassadors list already, and she's totally awesome, and I am sure 
that this will work out very well for all of us.

Second: Budget Status up to now

For FY12, which ended in February: We spent, as shown on the wiki, 
~$138k for the year, well below the estimated budget of $185k. There is 
no detail for a significant part in the latter half of the year as to 
how this money was spent; while I am continuing to attempt to sort that 
out, I cannot make any promises that we will ever have any significant 
transparency into that spending.

For FY13, which began March 1:  Fedora spending, including Regional 
Support and Premier Fedora Events, was approximately $34k. As with 
above, there is no detail; again, I am trying to procure that 
information, but cannot make promises.  Additionally, the details of 
spending between pools (Regional or Events or Discretionary) is not 
currently available.

Third: Remaining Budget for the rest of the year

The budget for this year was determined when it was in the hands of 
CommArch. As such, upon transfer, the OSAS team was handed the rest of 
the remaining budget.  Because we did not spend the entire budget for 
last year, this year's budget was smaller than last year's budget.

What I am currently looking at is a budget of approximately $148k for 
the year, which includes the $34k spent in Q1.  However, because of OSAS 
support, there may be room to increase this budget by approximately 
$20k; but because we are essentially needing to prove that it is a 
shortfall, we need to consider where this money would be going.  
Additionally, because we don't have any of the Q1 info on Regional vs. 
Events, it's unclear how the buckets going forward will be divided up.

Fourth: Moving forward

I would like for us to collectively get back to having the transparency 
and efficiency that we previously had.  OSAS has committed to publishing 
the status on at least a monthly basis, if not more often; that may be 
slow at the beginning, as we are still collecting some bits of 
information/data, and we'll need to do some wiki work and organization 
to get things started.  But I expect that as we enter Q3 (Starting in 
August) that they should be able to do this regularly.  In addition to 
this, as we approach the end of the year, OSAS will work with us to 
ensure that the budget plan for the upcoming year is adequate, and be 
willing to expand as needed, whether for "just not enough" reasons or 
for more specific outreach strategies.

I believe we should consider the idea of having a finance group or 
mailing list, populated by people who are actually paying things and 
those that want to take an interest in the general well-being of the 
efficiency of the budget management.  An alternative would be to have a 
consolidated trac instance for either tracking reimbursements or 
tracking requests and reimbursements. We have multiple tracs, many folks 
who are able to pay for things, and I think it would be useful to have a 
centralized place for communication, providing status updates, receiving 
"hey where the heck is my money" mails that are more transparent than 
pinging one individual, and so forth.  This does NOT mean taking 
decision-making out of the places where they are currently made; I am 
referring ONLY to a consolidated place where we can see that something 
previously approved by the appropriate group needs to be bought, paid, 
has been bought or paid, etc. - even including things such as, "Robyn 
paid $X for hotels for people at this conference," etc.  Food for 
thought - just trying to figure out how to get to a place where we 
aren't trying to keep track of status in multiple trac instances. Ideas 
(or agreement) are welcome here, particularly from those who have 
community credit cards.

(I'll mention right now that the community cards are remaining as they 
were, and that they could possibly be expanded; I will work with the 
current holders to ensure that their process includes sending the 
statements/receipts/whatever else to the appropriate new contacts.)

Additionally: Going forward, we need to attempt to stay reasonably close 
to our projections of spending for each quarter.  This does not mean 
that we need to divide up the money evenly among quarters, just that we 
need to have some sort of number in mind each quarter and that we do not 
go over it by some ridiculous amount.

Fifth: WHAT I NEED.

I previously mentioned the remaining budget for the rest of the year, 
and the need to estimate what is yet to be spent, what is needed, etc., 
as well as the amount currently set vs. possible expansion of the budget.

To that end, I have put together a wiki page of a Draft/Projected FY13 
budget here, in an effort to project what we may or may not be missing:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Accounting/DraftFY13

Please note that this wiki page is FULL of detail.  I've started 
outlining what has already been spent in Q2 (again, still getting some 
of this detail together), as well as including some of the items that 
have been approved in various regions for this quarter, outstanding 
reimbursements, etc.  For Q3 and Q4 (August - February), I have looked 
to the summaries of past years and events in those years, to come up 
with a "reasonable guess" of what we might spend, by quarter.

What I need is the following:
* If there are any outstanding, unpaid reimbursements not already 
accounted for in this list.  This includes FUDCon reimbursements, which 
I have not even begun to sort through.
* Obvious events which we regularly attend that are not present on this 
list.
* Estimates for shipping in various regions
* Release parties - no idea how many we do, need a round number here
* If people have already requested budget for a FAD from CommArch that 
has not yet occurred

I know that in requesting this, I am sort of opening the floodgates - 
please, try and be as reasonable as we have always been in the past 
about spending.  This is not a "we want 10 thousand tee shirts" request 
form. :)  This list does not have to be things that are "already 
approved" - if we've done it in the past, and we're likely to do it 
again, and it's not on this list, please, add it, or if it's an idea 
that has been brought up but maybe not totally confirmed, add it.

For things on this list, I have attached some lightly padded, round $ 
amounts. These are not set in stone, they are not approved by anyone 
(save for some Q2 events), please do not assume that I am just approving 
them out of band. I am merely trying to work up a draft that looks 
reasonable so that we can have a set budget.

IF YOU HAVE THINGS YOU BELIEVE SHOULD BE ADDED TO THIS LIST, please add 
the items to the appropriate quarter, and PLEASE, pretty please, click 
the "your signature with timestamp" button, so that I can see who added 
it (and that it got added!) without having to track through multiple 
levels of wiki history.  Your help in doing this is greatly appreciated 
- I am, sadly, incapable of knowing everything. :)  If you don't know 
what quarter it goes in, feel free to make a new section for "I know 
this should be on the list but not sure where it goes," or something 
along those lines.

I additionally have a section at the bottom of the wiki page for things 
that need to be done VERY SOON in the interest of transparency and 
accuracy on the wiki. This includes moving old budget info over, 
creating an FY13 page, and updating references to CommArch on the wiki. 
If you know of pages that need updating, please, list them there, so 
they can get the love that they need.

Once we have a solidified budget and wiki pages are updated 
appropriately, I'll be announcing more formally the budget transition to 
the wider community.  Obviously, since the Ambassadors team has the most 
interaction with the budget, I want to make sure we're all doing this 
together and transitioning all of that information in a way that is 
comfortable for all of us , hence talking with everyone through these 
items here first.

Finally:

I *very* much appreciate everyone's continued patience and prodding on 
this.  The Ambassadors have long been incredibly responsible and 
faithful in their tending of the budget and the outreach that we do, and 
I want that to continue.  The folks in OSAS are committed to working 
closely with us, and want this transition to be as absolutely smooth as 
possible, and do not want to incur mass changes in how we do things; I 
am looking forward to getting things back to running well, and I hope 
that everyone is willing to pitch in with ideas for how we can improve 
upon what we currently have.

As we move forward, I would love to see some effort put into more 
forward-thinking planning, particularly before we enter the period where 
the budget for next year is set (December-ish) - outlining plans for the 
upcoming year, thinking about spending for events and swag needs for the 
upcoming year, thinking about new ways to do outreach and what it will 
take to do those efforts.  While I will leave that idea in the hands of 
FAmSCo leadership to drive if they wish - I think it is something where 
Fedora could really expand in the future and benefit from, and so I hope 
that Ambassadors worldwide keep this in mind as they continue their work 
this year, and keep an eye out for new opportunities, and their minds 
open to trying new things, and reaching new people.

Obviously this was an incredibly long email, and I expect that there are 
a multitude of questions.  Please feel free to ask, and I will answer as 
best as I possibly can.

Thanks!

-Robyn

[FAmSCo] Budget information, updates.

[Christoph Wickert]

Hi Robyn,

thanks a lot for all your work cleaning up the mess and doing the
transition to OSAS. Really appreciated, however there is one thing that
makes me sad:

Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2012, 10:09 -0400 schrieb Robyn Bergeron:

>  For FY12, which ended in February: We spent, as shown on the wiki, 
>  ~$138k for the year, well below the estimated budget of $185k.
>
>  [...]
>
>  Because we did not spend the entire budget for 
>  last year, this year's budget was smaller than last year's budget. 
FAmSCo had to dramatically cut costs in Q4 of FY12 because we were told
we were more or less out of money. We postponed whatever was possible
and only spent money on sending people to events or reimbursing them,
but all swag production had come to a stop. Here in EMEA we are out of
swag except stickers and cheatcubes ad people beg for shirts and stuff.

There is no use complaining but I think we need to get back to the old
budget and old level of swag production ASAP. Of course this requires
strict accounting, we can only spend the money that we have.

What else is needed to get back to the old budget? Will we need to spend
all money and have the budget increase over time (years!) or is there a
quicker way to restore the previous state?

Kind regards,
Christoph

[FAmSCo] Budget information, updates.

[inode0]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  Am Dienstag, den 24.07.2012, 10:09 -0400 schrieb Robyn Bergeron:
> > For FY12, which ended in February: We spent, as shown on the wiki,
> > ~$138k for the year, well below the estimated budget of $185k.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Because we did not spend the entire budget for
> > last year, this year's budget was smaller than last year's budget.
>
>  FAmSCo had to dramatically cut costs in Q4 of FY12 because we were told
>  we were more or less out of money. We postponed whatever was possible
>  and only spent money on sending people to events or reimbursing them,
>  but all swag production had come to a stop. Here in EMEA we are out of
>  swag except stickers and cheatcubes ad people beg for shirts and stuff. 
The same was true in NA. We were told we were basically out of money
even though what records there were did not indicate that we were even
close to out of money. We stopped spending based on that information.

John

[David Ramsey]

Hello Everyone,



Greetings. :)

Thank you for your e-mail.  :)

I have read and I think I understand, but I will re-read again to make sure points are
understood in order to convey with others.  :)

>  Fifth: WHAT I NEED.
>  
>  I previously mentioned the remaining budget for the rest of the year, and the need to
> estimate what is yet to be spent, what is needed, etc., as well as the amount currently
> set vs. possible expansion of the budget.
>  
>  To that end, I have put together a wiki page of a Draft/Projected FY13 budget here, in an
> effort to project what we may or may not be missing:
>  
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Accounting/DraftFY13
>  
>  Please note that this wiki page is FULL of detail.  I've started outlining what has
> already been spent in Q2 (again, still getting some of this detail together), as well as
> including some of the items that have been approved in various regions for this quarter,
> outstanding reimbursements, etc.  For Q3 and Q4 (August - February), I have looked to the
> summaries of past years and events in those years, to come up with a "reasonable
> guess" of what we might spend, by quarter.
>  
>  What I need is the following:
>  * If there are any outstanding, unpaid reimbursements not already accounted for in this
> list.  This includes FUDCon reimbursements, which I have not even begun to sort through.
>  * Obvious events which we regularly attend that are not present on this list.
>  * Estimates for shipping in various regions
>  * Release parties - no idea how many we do, need a round number here
>  * If people have already requested budget for a FAD from CommArch that has not yet
> occurred 
Robyn, by when do you need feedback and other wiki updates to the Draft/Projected FY 13
by?  :)

Lastly, your referenced e-mail is on my next meeting's agenda for Saturday, August
04th if that is "not" too late to provide more data points.  :)

Sending positive Fedora 16 & 17 to your computers now.  :v)



Please have a Great Fedora day and/or evening! :~)



Thank You

Sincerely

=-=-=-=-=

- David -

=-=-=-=-=

David Ramsey

---------------------------------

一石二鳥
いっせきにちょう

One stone; two birds.

To kill 2 birds with 1 stone.

=

Fedora Project's Japan & Maryland Ambassador dramsey(a)fedoraproject.org
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dramsey
With sixteen (16) x86_64 computing cores, 80 GB of RAM and eight SATA 
Seagate 7200.12 - 500 GB harddisks.
The system definitions are at the following URL:
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dramsey#Using_embedded_code_have_upda...

=