-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Kranz wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 13:47 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:
> On 4/19/07, jan birsa <jan(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> Oh, N0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
>>
>> I use my firstname.lastname(a)fedoraproject.org EVERYWHERE
>>
>>
>> Oh, CRAP...
> Please check with Mike. He might make an exception case by case.
I don't get it anyway. The world is changing from this old-style
hash-like bad-to-remember cruzsdjqh12(a)blablubb.com and we introduce it
because of "technical" issues.
I would really love to learn more about the technical reasons. Maybe it
could just be resolved by introducing Microsoft Exchange servers.
It's Friday ...
Matthias
While I personally like the fn.ln.fp.o there are some issues.
There are characters in some names which postfix doesn't support, so
invalid email addresses are created. (think about the many non-western
charsets) There is also a concern of fn.ln collisions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGKMSZkZOYj+cNI1cRAuHcAJsFvhlrr2zg62MYvkT70HRIHzTJbACgihvs
1BoZosVB0qXWX8Jo5L87dW0=
=l/c9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----