Anaconda-devel April 2004

anaconda-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

38 participants
71 discussions

pkgorder, where do this file goes
by Chan, Dominic 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

My build directory structure looks like this on my workstation /var /LZ /RedHat /base /RPMS /autorun /images /isolinux So basically, the root of the RedHat cd start at /var/LZ My question is as follow. First, if I want to generate a pkgfile for my build, where do I output the pkgfile to? I think I got the command to work, but not sure where should the final destination be located at? Second, what name (or variable) should I use after i386, I am using RHEL as the name. This is a RedHat Enterprise 3.0 Update 1 build This is what I use, and the pkgfile file is sitting at the /var/LZ, the root of the RedHat CD PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/anaconda /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/pkgorder /var/LZ/ i386 RHEL > /var/LZ/pkgfile Any feedback or comment will be strongly appreciated dwc Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_francais.… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/F�r_die_deutsche_�bersetzung_bitte_hier_… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_vers�o_em_Portugu�s.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D�_un_clic_aqu�_para_su_traducci�n_al_es… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm

1 0

Re: redhat ppc installation failed while decompressing
by James_Martin＠ao.uscourts.gov 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

Try starting the install at the syslinux prompt with : linux text You may be having a problem with the xServer.. You could also do : linux vnc and connect a remote vnc client to the IP you assign the server and finish the installation that way. James James S. Martin, RHCE Contractor Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, DC (202) 502-2394 craig qu <craigqu(a)yahoo.com> Sent by: anaconda-devel-list-bounces(a)redhat.com 04/20/2004 04:28 PM To: Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com cc: Subject: redhat ppc installation failed while decompressing Hello all, I got problems while I am installing Red Hat Enterprise Linux/ppc AS 3 (Taroon) on a AmigaOne system. Following are outputs from consoles. The problem happens after Formatting filesystems, transferring install image to hard drive, and preparing RPM packages. Please give me some ideas about what causes the problem and how to avoid this. Your help is appreciated. --Craig Console 1: 1...2...3...4...5... Xserver started successfully. install exited abnormally sending termination signals...done sending kill signals...done disbabling swap... /tmp/hda3 unmounting filesystems... /mnt/runtime done Console 3 * moving (1) to setp setuptime * moving (1) to setp preinstallconfig * moving (1) to setp installpackages Console 4 <4>Unable to identify CD-ROM format <4>VFS: Can't find ext2 filesystem on dev loop(7,0). <6>Adding Swap: 392104k swap-space (priority -1) <6>kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds <6>EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.19, 19 August 2002 on ide0(3,2), internal journal <6>EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. <4>Error -3 while decompressing! <4>c02f32b3(2481)->c55f3000(4096) <4>Error -3 while decompressing! <4>c02f3c64(2481)->c5607000(4096) <4>Error -3 while decompressing! <4>c02f4667(2481)->c5606000(4096) ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

2 2

RE: FW: Missing RPM
by Chan, Dominic 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

Let me expand the question 1. does it matter if get this error? Basically, can I ignore it 2. is pkgorder (which I have to generate from scratch) a text file that I could edit it manually? dwc -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 12:59 PM To: Chan, Dominic Cc: anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com Subject: RE: FW: Missing RPM On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 05:56, Chan, Dominic wrote: > So how did you get around the bug? > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57911: line 3: /sbin/install-info: No such file or > > directory > > error: %post(libgcj-3.2.3-20) scriptlet failed, exit status 12 > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107930' I rebuilt libgcj with the patch attached to that bug. You could also just make sure that info is installed before libgcj (in pkgorder). Forrest Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_francais.… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/F�r_die_deutsche_�bersetzung_bitte_hier_… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_vers�o_em_Portugu�s.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D�_un_clic_aqu�_para_su_traducci�n_al_es… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm

1 0

RE: FW: Missing RPM
by Chan, Dominic 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

So how did you get around the bug? dwc -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 6:13 PM To: Chan, Dominic Cc: anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com Subject: RE: FW: Missing RPM On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:10, Chan, Dominic wrote: > In my case, I combine RPM from CD 1,2,3,and 4 into one CD, so > technically, I did delete the overall RPM counts. Is this mean I also > need to use buildinstall also, or is genhdlist enough? By the way, I > just try using genhdlist in a newer rebuild environment (build > workstation is RHEL 3.0, and the custom build CD I am trying to make is > also RHEL3.0), and ran into the same problem. It install 251 of the 257 > packages. The good news is that the during the installation, it update > the RPM that got install from the /Redhat/Updates folder on the CD. > However, I am still getting the following error in my install.log > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57911: line 3: /sbin/install-info: No such file or > directory > error: %post(libgcj-3.2.3-20) scriptlet failed, exit status 12 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107930' Forrest Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_francais.… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/F�r_die_deutsche_�bersetzung_bitte_hier_… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_vers�o_em_Portugu�s.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D�_un_clic_aqu�_para_su_traducci�n_al_es… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm

2 1

Re: custom fedora missing /mnt/floppy and /mnt/cdrom dirs
by Paul Pianta 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

Taylor, ForrestX wrote: >Another way to tell if you have autofs running on /mnt is to `ls -la >/mnt`. If the the size of the /mnt (.) directory is 0, then you know >that autofs is overrunning that directory. > > This is what I get from a `ls -la /mnt` on the machine --- total 2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1024 Oct 7 2003 . drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 1024 Apr 20 13:19 .. --- so I guess autofs isn't running on /mnt ... should it be? coz it isn't running on /mnt on my workstation either. thanks pantz -- Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes ... That way when you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes!

2 3

Re: FW: Missing RPM
by Paul Pianta 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

Chan, Dominic wrote: >Can you tell what what does the inside of your Fedora >/data/Fedora-Test/i386 folder looks like? I presume it looks like the >root of the CD where it contains Redhat, images, isolinux, etc. > > `ls /data/Fedora-Test/i386/` autorun dosutils Fedora GPL images isolinux I removed some of the single files, eg. README, GPG-Keys, etc. >2nd, the command in your script > >/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/genhdlist --withnumbers --productpath=Fedora >/data/Fedora-Test/i386 > >Is there a space after the 2st Fedora? It is >'--productpath=Fedora /data/Fedora-Test/i386' or >'--productpath=Fedora/data/Fedora-Test/i386' where not space between >Fedora and data > > There is a space between them ... '--productpath=Fedora /data/Fedora-Test/i386' >Lastly, how many CD is your custom distro? Do you have all RPMS needed >fitted on a single CD? I am trying to see what scheme you are using > > Yes I have just a single CD. All rpms fit easily - my CD is only 322Mb. pantz -- Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes ... That way when you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes!

1 0

Problems with partitions and ext3
by trick17＠toofunky.de 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

Hi everyone My problem is the following: I must automatic add a /var partition. Thats why I edited the autorequests in the installclass.py: def setDefaultPartitioning(...) autorequests = [ ("/", None, 1024, 1024, 1, 1), ("/var", None, 1024, None, 1, 1)] that works well, but I need ext3. But wenn I set the FSType parameter to "ext3" the installation crashes. Wenn I just change the "/var" partition to ext3 the installation works, but the var partition is not mounted automatic Anyone knows what I did wrong Thanks Martin PS: Sorry for my poor english

1 0

Re: anaconda does not find root for upgrade
by Erik Red 23 Apr '04

23 Apr '04

For everyone's reference purposes, here is the solution to my previous problem. Thanks again to Forrest Taylor for spending a lot of time on this one... ============================================================================== Redhat Fedora Core 1 refused to UPGRADE from Redhat 9 as long as smartbootmgr (SBM) was installed in MBR. Had to remove the SBM (use the self-removal feature) before the upgrade would proceed. (Reinstall afterwards, or let Grub be the main boot manager.) What is the cause of the problem? Apparently the following: Anaconda uses libparted.so (which is the library for /usr/sbin/parted). Parted is confused by the MBR when SBM is installed, although the partition table itself clearly is ok (the system runs fine as rh-9.0). Parted returns that the disk partition table (aka. "disk label") is of type "loop". This is what happens when parted cannot find what it deems to be a valid partition table. The disk is then perceived as a being raw disk with no structure ("loop" presumably refers to a "loopback"). The installer then decides there is nothing to upgrade, and therefore does not permit the upgrade option. Reference: Smart boot manager http://btmgr.sourceforge.net/ ============================================================================== >From the Parted mailing list... ============================================================================== From: Andrew Clausen Subject: Re: NTFS bug: partition table image as requested Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 08:34:55 +1000 User-agent: Mutt/1.4i On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:35:55PM +0200, Matteo Fiorito wrote: >I believe it is not a virus, never had any problems. >However it might be that the Smart Boot Manager (version 3.7.1) I am using >to boot my dual OS comp is confusing parted recognition of the devices >partition. Correct. The boot manager has a FAT signature in it. It shouldn't do this! I can't think of any safe work-arounds. I think they should fix it. Cheers, Andrew ============================================================================== >From the Smart Boot Manager mailing list... ============================================================================== From: James Su <suzhe98@y...> Date: Sat Nov 1, 2003 5:22 pm Subject: Re: [btmgr] I can't install linux in drives with smart boot manager Should be OK. --- Unai Uribarri <unaiur@y...> %Gï¿œï¿œï¿œï¿œï¿œÄ£ï¿œ%@> GNU >Parted gets confused when it reads "FAT" at >position 0x36 of the >boot sector of smart boot manager, and thinks that >the whole disk is a >single FAT partition. > >If I replace that string with three spaces, will >btmgr boot correctly? ============================================================================== _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

1 0

RE: FW: Missing RPM
by Chan, Dominic 22 Apr '04

22 Apr '04

In my case, I combine RPM from CD 1,2,3,and 4 into one CD, so technically, I did delete the overall RPM counts. Is this mean I also need to use buildinstall also, or is genhdlist enough? By the way, I just try using genhdlist in a newer rebuild environment (build workstation is RHEL 3.0, and the custom build CD I am trying to make is also RHEL3.0), and ran into the same problem. It install 251 of the 257 packages. The good news is that the during the installation, it update the RPM that got install from the /Redhat/Updates folder on the CD. However, I am still getting the following error in my install.log /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57911: line 3: /sbin/install-info: No such file or directory error: %post(libgcj-3.2.3-20) scriptlet failed, exit status 12 Any idea? dwc -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 4:50 PM To: Chan, Dominic Cc: anaconda-devel-list(a)redhat.com Subject: RE: FW: Missing RPM If you just want to add RPMs, you only need genhdlist. If you want to remove RPMs, change the installer, optimize the CD layout for your packages, etc., then you need buildinstall and friends. Check out this site for more information: http://rau.homedns.org/twiki/bin/view/Anaconda/AnacondaDocumentationProj ect Forrest On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:37, Chan, Dominic wrote: > Can you tell me what exactly does pkgorder and buildinstall do? Is it > require? > > dwc > > -----Original Message----- > From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:04 PM > To: Chan, Dominic > Subject: RE: FW: Missing RPM > > Did you just run genhdlist, or did you run pkgorder, buildinstall, etc.? > > On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:33, Chan, Dominic wrote: > > I did the iso creation in rh9.0 machine that contains my rhel 3.0 > files > > > > dwc > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:26 PM > > To: Chan, Dominic > > Subject: Re: FW: Missing RPM > > > > On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 06:34, Chan, Dominic wrote: > > > Here is my original post to the group, maybe you could see something > I > > > miss > > > > > > > > > > > > We are building a custom rhel CD, all package that we need to > install > > > fit into a CD (257 Packages). I updated the hdlist with the > hdgenlist > > > command and build myself a new iso with the custom ks.cfg I created. > > > > Here is my package section from my ks.cfg > > > > > > > > > My problems are as follow. If I use the original 4 CD set from RHEL > > > 3.0 Update 1, and the custom ks.cfg on a floppy. During boot-up, I > > > type linux ks=floppy, the installation go by without a hitch! All > > > packages install as expected, and the RPM inside the Update folder > on > > > the 1st CD also get apply. However, if I use the custom CD I have > > > created, and the custom ks.cfg on the floppy. During boot-up, I > type > > > the same linux ks=floppy command, about 4 of the RPM are not > installed > > > (i.e. libdbi, libxslt,lockdev,mx). Also, the RPM in the Update > folder > > > are not being applied during installation like it would normally > > > does. And finally, if I look at my package section of > anaconda-ks.cfg > > > after the build, it has been alter drastically compare to what I was > > > expecting > > > > Did you create these discs while in a running RHEL 3.0 machine, or did > > you use a FC1/RHL9/RHEL2.1 machine? > > > > > > Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation > intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the > individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This > message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and > thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under > applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the > message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use > of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original > message from your e-mail system. > > > > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_franca > is.htm > > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Fr_die_deutsche_bersetzung_bitte_hier > _klicken.htm > > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_verso_em_Portugus.ht > m > > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D_un_clic_aqu_para_su_traduccin_al_es > paol.htm > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm > > > > > Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_franca is.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Fr_die_deutsche_bersetzung_bitte_hier _klicken.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_verso_em_Portugus.ht m > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D_un_clic_aqu_para_su_traduccin_al_es paol.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm > Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_francais.… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/F�r_die_deutsche_�bersetzung_bitte_hier_… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_vers�o_em_Portugu�s.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D�_un_clic_aqu�_para_su_traducci�n_al_es… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm

2 1

RE: FW: Missing RPM
by Chan, Dominic 22 Apr '04

22 Apr '04

Can you tell me what exactly does pkgorder and buildinstall do? Is it require? dwc -----Original Message----- From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:04 PM To: Chan, Dominic Subject: RE: FW: Missing RPM Did you just run genhdlist, or did you run pkgorder, buildinstall, etc.? On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:33, Chan, Dominic wrote: > I did the iso creation in rh9.0 machine that contains my rhel 3.0 files > > dwc > > -----Original Message----- > From: Taylor, ForrestX [mailto:forrestx.taylor@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 4:26 PM > To: Chan, Dominic > Subject: Re: FW: Missing RPM > > On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 06:34, Chan, Dominic wrote: > > Here is my original post to the group, maybe you could see something I > > miss > > > > > > > > We are building a custom rhel CD, all package that we need to install > > fit into a CD (257 Packages). I updated the hdlist with the hdgenlist > > command and build myself a new iso with the custom ks.cfg I created. > > Here is my package section from my ks.cfg > > > > > > My problems are as follow. If I use the original 4 CD set from RHEL > > 3.0 Update 1, and the custom ks.cfg on a floppy. During boot-up, I > > type linux ks=floppy, the installation go by without a hitch! All > > packages install as expected, and the RPM inside the Update folder on > > the 1st CD also get apply. However, if I use the custom CD I have > > created, and the custom ks.cfg on the floppy. During boot-up, I type > > the same linux ks=floppy command, about 4 of the RPM are not installed > > (i.e. libdbi, libxslt,lockdev,mx). Also, the RPM in the Update folder > > are not being applied during installation like it would normally > > does. And finally, if I look at my package section of anaconda-ks.cfg > > after the build, it has been alter drastically compare to what I was > > expecting > > Did you create these discs while in a running RHEL 3.0 machine, or did > you use a FC1/RHL9/RHEL2.1 machine? > > > Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. > > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_franca is.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Fr_die_deutsche_bersetzung_bitte_hier _klicken.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_verso_em_Portugus.ht m > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D_un_clic_aqu_para_su_traduccin_al_es paol.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm > http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm > Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/cliquez_ici_pour_traduction_en_francais.… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/F�r_die_deutsche_�bersetzung_bitte_hier_… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Clicar_aqui_para_vers�o_em_Portugu�s.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/D�_un_clic_aqu�_para_su_traducci�n_al_es… http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Chinese.htm http://www.lubrizol.com/disclaimer/Japanese.htm

3 3

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Anaconda-devel April 2004