On 09/29/2011 02:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Jones (pjones@redhat.com) said:
Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull them in by default.
Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a compose if they fall out of comps?
Hrm. Probably not. Should I leave them in but put the type as something other than default, instead of this?
Bill
comps-f16.xml.in | 2 -- comps-f17.xml.in | 2 -- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in index be87539..819a907 100644 --- a/comps-f16.xml.in +++ b/comps-f16.xml.in @@ -756,8 +756,6 @@ <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq> <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq> <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq> -<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq> -<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq> diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644 --- a/comps-f17.xml.in +++ b/comps-f17.xml.in @@ -691,8 +691,6 @@ <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq> <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq> <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq> -<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq> -<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq> -- 1.7.6