[PATCH] Don't pull in grub2 or efibootmgr by default.

[Peter Jones]

Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
them in by default.
---
 comps-f16.xml.in |    2 --
 comps-f17.xml.in |    2 --
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
index be87539..819a907 100644
--- a/comps-f16.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
@@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
       <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
-      <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
-      <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
--- a/comps-f17.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
@@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
       <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
-      <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
-      <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>

[Bill Nottingham]

Peter Jones ([e-mail]) said:
> Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> them in by default.

Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
compose if they fall out of comps?

Bill
> comps-f16.xml.in |    2 --
>  comps-f17.xml.in |    2 --
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
> index be87539..819a907 100644
> --- a/comps-f16.xml.in
> +++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
> @@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
>        <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
>        <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
>        <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
>
> diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
> index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
> --- a/comps-f17.xml.in
> +++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
> @@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
>        <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
>        <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
>        <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
>  <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
>
> -- 
> 1.7.6

[Bill Nottingham]

Bill Nottingham ([e-mail]) said:
> Peter Jones ([e-mail]) said:
> > Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> > them in by default.
>
> Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
> compose if they fall out of comps?

... appears not. So, we'd need some other way to ensure they get on the DVD.
We could add them to the kickstart file as an exception, although that may
not translate well to all downstream distributions. We could move all the
bootloaders to a group that kickstarts and downstreams need, but isn't
exposted to the user.

Bill

[Peter Jones]

On 09/29/2011 02:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Jones ([e-mail]) said:
> > Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> > them in by default.
>
> Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
> compose if they fall out of comps?

Hrm.  Probably not.  Should I leave them in but put the type as something
other than default, instead of this?
> Bill
> > comps-f16.xml.in |    2 --
> >   comps-f17.xml.in |    2 --
> >   2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
> > index be87539..819a907 100644
> > --- a/comps-f16.xml.in
> > +++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
> > @@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
> >         <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
> > -<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
> > -<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
> > diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
> > index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
> > --- a/comps-f17.xml.in
> > +++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
> > @@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
> >         <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
> > -<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
> > -<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
> >         <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
> > --
> > 1.7.6

[Bill Nottingham]

Peter Jones ([e-mail]) said:
> On 09/29/2011 02:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Peter Jones ([e-mail]) said:
> > > Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> > > them in by default.
> >
> > Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
> > compose if they fall out of comps?
>
> Hrm.  Probably not.  Should I leave them in but put the type as something
> other than default, instead of this?

Optional packages aren't pulled into the compose.

Bill