"PRE-RELEASE/TESTING"

[Danishka Navin]

Hi there,

When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,  "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING"
text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
May I know what could cause this?

both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along with
few 3rd party repos.

Regards,

Hello,
You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax. You
have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we
will be handling your ISO as Rawhide.
Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
Regards,Jirka
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,  "PRE-
> RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda
> GUI.
> May I know what could cause this?
>
> both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given
> values.
> both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along
> with few 3rd party repos.
> Regards,
>
> Danishka Navin
>
> _______________________________________________Anaconda-devel-list
> mailing [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Danishka Navin]

Hi Jirka,

I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at all.
Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
--product and --version?

livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
--fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp

Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my custom
configs.
I could not reproduce the issue.

I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the /etc/os-release
file.

REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"

Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of redhat-release
file.
I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.

https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png

Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png

If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
When using "Hanthana 30"
https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax. You
> have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we will be
> handling your ISO as Rawhide.
>
> Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
>
> Regards,
> Jirka
>
> On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,  "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING"
> text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
> May I know what could cause this?
>
> both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
> both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along with
> few 3rd party repos.
> Regards,
>
> Danishka Navin
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
>
> [e-mail]
>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Vendula Poncova]

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin  wrote:
> Hi Jirka,
>
> I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at all.
> Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
> --product and --version?
>
> livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
> --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
>
> Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my custom
> configs.
> I could not reproduce the issue.
>
> I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the /etc/os-release
> file.
>
> REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
>
> Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of redhat-release
> file.
> I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
>
> https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
>
> Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
> https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
>
> If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> When using "Hanthana 30"
> https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax. You
> > have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we will be
> > handling your ISO as Rawhide.
> >
> > Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jirka
> >
> > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
> > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
> > May I know what could cause this?

Hello,

for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the flag for a
final release:
https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L...

Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that provides
system-release, so I would check that.

What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your ISO?
rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release

Vendy
> both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
> > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along with
> > few 3rd party repos.
> > Regards,
> >
> > Danishka Navin
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> >
> > [e-mail]
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> --
> Danishka Navin
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Danishka Navin]

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova  wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin  wrote:
> > Hi Jirka,
> >
> > I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at all.
> > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
> > --product and --version?
> >
> > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
> > --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
> >
> > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my custom
> > configs.
> > I could not reproduce the issue.
> >
> > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the /etc/os-release
> > file.
> >
> > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> >
> > Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of redhat-release
> > file.
> > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
> >
> > https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
> >
> > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
> > https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
> >
> > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> > When using "Hanthana 30"
> > https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax. You
> > > have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we will be
> > > handling your ISO as Rawhide.
> > >
> > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jirka
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
> > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
> > > May I know what could cause this?
>
> Hello,
>
> for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the flag for a
> final release:
>
> https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L...
>
> Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that provides
> system-release, so I would check that.
>
> What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your ISO?
> rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release

$ rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
$ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
900[
> Vendy
> > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
> > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along with
> > > few 3rd party repos.
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Danishka Navin
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > >
> > > [e-mail]
> > >
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> > --
> > Danishka Navin
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Vendula Poncova]

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin  wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova 
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin  wrote:
> > > Hi Jirka,
> > >
> > > I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at
> > > all.
> > > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
> > > --product and --version?
> > >
> > > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
> > > --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
> > >
> > > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my custom
> > > configs.
> > > I could not reproduce the issue.
> > >
> > > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the /etc/os-release
> > > file.
> > >
> > > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > >
> > > Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> > > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of
> > > redhat-release file.
> > > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
> > >
> > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
> > >
> > > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
> > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
> > >
> > > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> > > When using "Hanthana 30"
> > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png

Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from
/etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in network
installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file below. I think
that all these problems are related.
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax. You
> > > > have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we will be
> > > > handling your ISO as Rawhide.
> > > >
> > > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jirka
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > >
> > > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
> > > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
> > > > May I know what could cause this?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the flag for a
> > final release:
> >
> > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L...
> >
> > Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that provides
> > system-release, so I would check that.
> >
> > What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your ISO?
> > rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
>
> $ rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
> $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> 900[

It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the environment
variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is started.

Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp file to
determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't have this file and
should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to the .buildstamp file can
be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp or set by the environment
variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check that these files do not exist on
your ISO?

Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
and attach the Anaconda logs from the installation.
> > Vendy
> > > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
> > > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along
> > > > with few 3rd party repos.
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Danishka Navin
> > > >
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > >
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > >
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > >
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > >
> > > --
> > > Danishka Navin
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> --
> Danishka Navin
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Danishka Navin]

Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose?

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:11 PM Vendula Poncova  wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin  wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova 
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Jirka,
> > > >
> > > > I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at
> > > > all.
> > > > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
> > > > --product and --version?
> > > >
> > > > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
> > > > --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
> > > >
> > > > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my custom
> > > > configs.
> > > > I could not reproduce the issue.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the
> > > > /etc/os-release file.
> > > >
> > > > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > >
> > > > Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> > > > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of
> > > > redhat-release file.
> > > > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
> > > >
> > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
> > > >
> > > > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
> > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
> > > >
> > > > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> > > > When using "Hanthana 30"
> > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
>
> Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from
> /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in network
> installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file below. I think
> that all these problems are related.
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax.
> > > > > You have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we
> > > > > will be handling your ISO as Rawhide.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Jirka
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi there,
> > > > >
> > > > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
> > > > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
> > > > > May I know what could cause this?
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the flag for a
> > > final release:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L...
> > >
> > > Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that provides
> > > system-release, so I would check that.
> > >
> > > What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your ISO?
> > > rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > > rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> >
> > $ rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
> > $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> > 900[
>
> It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the environment
> variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is started.
>
> Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp file to
> determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't have this file and
> should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to the .buildstamp file can
> be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp or set by the environment
> variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check that these files do not exist on
> your ISO?
>
> Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and attach the Anaconda logs from the
> installation.
> > > Vendy
> > > > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
> > > > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along
> > > > > with few 3rd party repos.
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Danishka Navin
> > > > >
> > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > > >
> > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Danishka Navin
> > > >
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> > --
> > Danishka Navin
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

"Modifying /etc/os-release for re-branding?"

On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:54 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose?

Hi Danishka Navin,
Good question on a bad place. Adding Fedora devel list here, there
could be someone who is able to answer you this question.
Jirka
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:11 PM Vendula Poncova 
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin 
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova <
> > > [e-mail]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin <
> > > > [e-mail]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Jirka,
> > > > >
> > > > > I used the following command but did't use --product and --
> > > > > version at all.
> > > > > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we
> > > > > ignore both --product and --version?
> > > > >
> > > > > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-
> > > > > workstation.ks --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
> > > > >
> > > > > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with
> > > > > my custom configs.
> > > > > I could not reproduce the issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the
> > > > > /etc/os-release file.
> > > > >
> > > > > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > > >
> > > > > Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> > > > > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of
> > > > > redhat-release file.
> > > > > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
> > > > >
> > > > > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release 
> > > > > file.
> > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
> > > > >
> > > > > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> > > > > When using "Hanthana 30"
> > > > >
> > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
> >
> > Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from
> > /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in
> > network installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file
> > below. I think that all these problems are related.
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were
> > > > > > invoking lorax. You have to use correct --product and --
> > > > > > version parameters otherwise we will be handling your ISO
> > > > > > as Rawhide.
> > > > > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to
> > > > > > create your ISO?
> > > > > > Regards,Jirka
> > > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi there,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO, 
> > > > > > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand
> > > > > > > side of anaconda GUI.
> > > > > > > May I know what could cause this?
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the
> > > > flag for a final release:
> > > > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L...
> > > >
> > > > Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that
> > > > provides system-release, so I would check that.
> > > >
> > > > What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your
> > > > ISO?
> > > >
> > > > rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > > > rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> > >
> > > $ rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > > fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
> > > $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> > > 900[
> >
> > It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the
> > environment variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is
> > started.
> > Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp
> > file to determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't
> > have this file and should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to
> > the .buildstamp file can be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp
> > or set by the environment variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check
> > that these files do not exist on your ISO?
> > Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and attach the Anaconda logs from the
> > installation.
> > > > Vendy
> > > > > > > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see
> > > > > > > given values.
> > > > > > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO
> > > > > > > build along with few 3rd party repos.  
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > Danishka Navin
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________Anaconda-
> > > > > > > devel-list mailing [e-mail]
> > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > > >
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Danishka Navin
> > > > >
> > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > >
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > >
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > >
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Danishka Navin
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > >
> > > [e-mail]
> > >
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> >
> > [e-mail]
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> _______________________________________________Anaconda-devel-list
> mailing [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Dennis Gilmore]

As you are adding no Fedora content you must use different branding
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Secondary_Mark
you are free to make your own release package and put content as you want
to.

Dennis

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, 05:25 Danishka Navin  wrote:
> Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose?
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:11 PM Vendula Poncova 
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin  wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Jirka,
> > > > >
> > > > > I used the following command but did't use --product and --version at
> > > > > all.
> > > > > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we ignore both
> > > > > --product and --version?
> > > > >
> > > > > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live-workstation.ks
> > > > > --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp
> > > > >
> > > > > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with my
> > > > > custom configs.
> > > > > I could not reproduce the issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the
> > > > > /etc/os-release file.
> > > > >
> > > > > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
> > > > >
> > > > > Btw, there is a new issue occurred.
> > > > > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of
> > > > > redhat-release file.
> > > > > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png
> > > > >
> > > > > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release file.
> > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png
> > > > >
> > > > > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit.
> > > > > When using "Hanthana 30"
> > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png
> >
> > Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from
> > /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in network
> > installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file below. I think
> > that all these problems are related.
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM  wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were invoking lorax.
> > > > > > You have to use correct --product and --version parameters otherwise we
> > > > > > will be handling your ISO as Rawhide.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to create your ISO?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Jirka
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi there,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO,
> > > > > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand side of anaconda GUI.
> > > > > > May I know what could cause this?
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the flag for a
> > > > final release:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L...
> > > >
> > > > Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that provides
> > > > system-release, so I would check that.
> > > >
> > > > What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your ISO?
> > > > rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > > > rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> > >
> > > $ rpm -q  --whatprovides system-release
> > > fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch
> > > $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release
> > > 900[
> >
> > It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the environment
> > variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is started.
> >
> > Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp file
> > to determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't have this file
> > and should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to the .buildstamp
> > file can be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp or set by the
> > environment variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check that these files do
> > not exist on your ISO?
> >
> > Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and attach the Anaconda logs from the
> > installation.
> > > > Vendy
> > > > > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see given values.
> > > > > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO build along
> > > > > > with few 3rd party repos.
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Danishka Navin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Danishka Navin
> > > > >
> > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > > >
> > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> > >
> > > --
> > > Danishka Navin
> > >
> > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
> >
> > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
>
> --
> Danishka Navin
>
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list