[PATCH] support ppc64le architecture

[Mark Hamzy]

Support PowerPC little endian architecture.

---
 blivet/arch.py | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/blivet/arch.py b/blivet/arch.py
index dd2f630..cbbf5e6 100644
--- a/blivet/arch.py
+++ b/blivet/arch.py
@@ -268,13 +268,13 @@ def isPPC(bits=None):
     arch = os.uname()[4]

if bits is None:
-        if arch == 'ppc' or arch == 'ppc64':
+        if arch in ('ppc', 'ppc64', 'ppc64le'):
             return True
     elif bits == 32:
-        if arch == 'ppc':
+        if arch in ('ppc'):
             return True
     elif bits == 64:
-        if arch == 'ppc64':
+        if arch in ('ppc64', 'ppc64le'):
             return True

return False

[Vratislav Podzimek]

On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 14:19 -0500, Mark Hamzy wrote:
> Support PowerPC little endian architecture.
>
> blivet/arch.py | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/blivet/arch.py b/blivet/arch.py
> index dd2f630..cbbf5e6 100644
> --- a/blivet/arch.py
> +++ b/blivet/arch.py
> @@ -268,13 +268,13 @@ def isPPC(bits=None):
>      arch = os.uname()[4]
>  if bits is None:
>    if arch == 'ppc' or arch == 'ppc64':
>    if arch in ('ppc', 'ppc64', 'ppc64le'):
>        return True
> elif bits == 32:
>    if arch == 'ppc':
>    if arch in ('ppc'):
>        return True
> elif bits == 64:
>    if arch == 'ppc64':
>    if arch in ('ppc64', 'ppc64le'):
>        return True
>
> return False

This looks good to me. However, is it really all we need to support
ppc64le?