On 11 Feb 2015 21:01, "Karanbir Singh" <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 07:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On 11 Feb 2015 19:00, "Karanbir Singh" <firstname.lastname@example.org
> > <mailto:email@example.com>> wrote:
> >> On 02/11/2015 03:40 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Karanbir Singh
> > <firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com>> wrote:
> >> >> hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Rumour has it that there were fedora19 tree's that worked for the APM
> >> >> Mustang boards. Where can I find this ? Or is fedora21 the only aarch64
> >> >> build published ?
> >> >
> >> > There was a bastard bring up set of scatch builds that weren't
> >> > suitable really for anything much and it went away as soon as enough
> >> > of the F-21 tree was built. F-21 is the only thing that is supported.
> >> I need something to base the bootstrap for the EL7 on armv7 off of, so
> >> getting access to a baseline older tree, as a mock target, would be
> > awesome.
> > So if you want to bootstrap armv7 you won't want aarch64 package
> > sets.... The ARMv7 f19 package sets are still on the archive mirrors
> > under secondary arches.
> right, correction - want to bootstarp aarch64
So someone might have an old mirror somewhere, if you're lucky, but as it wasn't an official release, it was hacked and horrid in every bring up way and everything went upstream it was killed because we needed the nas/san space.
TBH you'd be better off and more reproducible to do an initial bootstrap bringup on f21 and then move to mock centos 7 configs with the bringup builds and respind the builds running on f21 hosts than any of the f19 crap.