On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Jon Chiappetta
<Jon.Chiappetta(a)senecacollege.ca> wrote:
Ok so my quest for more reasonable build time comparisons is still
going. I
must be really bad at this... So I tried two new versions of the script, one
which just took PA's longest buildarch time and SA's shortest buildarch
time, however, the overall times summed up turned out to be way too
favorable on our behalf. The latest version now sums up the buildarch times
and divides them by how many of them there were. I think its a bit better
because the faster builders with faster build times will pull up the slower
build times, essentially its just an average calculation. The offset now for
us looks like around 15 days (half a month slower)? Anyway, the page is the
same. I still haven't filtered out our slowest builders from this list
either so the number of days could probably go down if I did. Let me know if
these numbers seem a bit more reasonable!
http://142.204.133.82/jon/builds/times.html
BTW how hard would it be to add the two builders (hardfp/softfp) in a
"notes" field at the end?
Peter