So! This is not nice!
I had 12 jails working before. I rewrote my private jail.config, didn't
help. Changed it in default jail.conf (should'nt), enabled 2 jails -
working. huh?
Reworte again my private config in jail.d with 2 jails, working. Based
on try and error, i confiirm for me, that 7 jails are working
flawlessy, from the eight on, it gives back the error-message. Can
anybody confirm this?
Clear bug for me!
Roger
Am Freitag, den 01.09.2017, 09:11 -0500 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
El jue, 31-08-2017 a las 21:50 +0200, Roger Grosswiler escribió:
> hi,
>
> thanks, yes i saw the bug, even if its quite old. i didnt find
> where
> to change that number.
>
> i have 7 jails, none of them is starting, just one main thread,
> which
> does not seem to be a jail.
>
> the service is running as yours does. but there is no jail at all,
> i
> think, as i get no mail notification about any jail.
>
> i use mail notification, do you?
I do get mail notifcations and my jail/s work.
my /etc/fail2ban/jail.local looks like the following
[DEFAULT]
findtime = 86400
bantime = 86400
banaction = firewallcmd-ipset
backend = systemd
sender = <actual email>
destemail = <actual email>
action = %(action_mwl)s
[sshd]
enabled = true
I also have a few other jails enabled where appropriate. I have the
following packages installed
fail2ban-systemd-0.9.7-2.fc26.noarch
fail2ban-server-0.9.7-2.fc26.noarch
fail2ban-firewalld-0.9.7-2.fc26.noarch
fail2ban-sendmail-0.9.7-2.fc26.noarch
Dennis
> Am 31. August 2017 21:05:50 MESZ schrieb Daniel Laczi <daniell1@t-
> online.de>:
> > Hi,
> > Mine works fine:
> > ● fail2ban.service - Fail2Ban Service
> > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/fail2ban.service;
> > enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
> > Active: active (running) since Tue 2017-06-27 23:46:09 CEST; 2
> > months 4 days ago
> > Docs: man:fail2ban(1)
> > Process: 698 ExecStart=/usr/bin/fail2ban-client -x start
> > (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
> > Main PID: 977 (fail2ban-server)
> > Tasks: 3 (limit: 4915)
> > CGroup: /system.slice/fail2ban.service
> > └─977 /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/bin/fail2ban-server -s
> > /var/run/fail2ban/fail2ban.sock -p /var/run/fail2ban/fail2ban.pid
> > -x -b
> >
> > Jun 27 23:45:50 servername systemd[1]: Starting Fail2Ban
> > Service...
> > Jun 27 23:46:06 servername fail2ban-client[698]: 2017-06-27
> > 23:46:06,491 fail2ban.server [924]: INFO Starting
> > Fail2ban v0.9.7
> > Jun 27 23:46:06 servername fail2ban-client[698]: 2017-06-27
> > 23:46:06,508 fail2ban.server [924]: INFO Starting in
> > daemon mode
> > Jun 27 23:46:09 servername systemd[1]: Started Fail2Ban Service.
> > Same kernel.
> > However I have only one jail. How many jails do you have? Does it
> > start if you reduce the number of jails? Have you seen this:
> > https:
> > //github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/969 Unfortunately the bug
> > is
> > still open...
> > Am 31.08.2017 um 07:55 schrieb Roger Grosswiler:
> > > Hello,
> > > Release: Linux stbarth 4.12.8-300.fc26.armv7hl #1 SMP Thu Aug
> > > 17
> > > 18:39:25 UTC 2017 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
> > > Fail2ban: fail2ban.noarch 0.9.7-2.fc26
> > > ...and some logs...
> > >
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth systemd[1]: Started Fail2Ban Service.
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:55 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: ERROR NOK:
> > > ("can't start new thread",)
> > > Aug 31 07:53:51 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: 2017-08-31
> > > 07:53:51,542 fail2ban.server [2888]: INFO Starting
> > > in
> > > daemon mode
> > > Aug 31 07:53:51 stbarth fail2ban-client[2887]: 2017-08-31
> > > 07:53:51,540 fail2ban.server [2888]: INFO Starting
> > > Fail2ban v0.9.7
> > > Aug 31 07:53:48 stbarth systemd[1]: Starting Fail2Ban
> > > Service...
> > > Thanks!
> > > Roger
> > >
> > > Am 2017-08-30 16:17, schrieb Peter Robinson:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Roger Grosswiler <roger@gwch
> > > > .n
> > > > et> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > is someone else experiencing problems? with fail2ban and
> > > > > systemd?
> > > > >
> > > > > Mine doesn't start the jails, client itself is running. Log
> > > > > says, it cannot
> > > > > create a separate child per jail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What release/version?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject
> > > > .o
> > > > rg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.o
> > > rg
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org