On 5 Aug 2011 19:15, "Gordan Bobic" <gordan@bobich.net> wrote:
>
> How does one pick the correct "ports" part of glibc for the correct core?
>
> I tried to build the RHEL6 glibc with the F13 ports tar ball, but the
> build eventually fails:
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi/4.4.5/libgcc_eh.a(unwind-arm.o):
> In function `__gnu_Unwind_Backtrace':
> (.text+0x8b8): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_guard'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Looks very much like the error in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726495

HTH,
Niels

> I'm guessing this is to do with the mismatch between
> glibc-ports-2.12-26-gcf64098.tar.xz from the F13 package
> and
> glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1-fedora.tar.bz2
> glibc-2.12-2-gc4ccff1.tar.bz2
> from the RHEL6 package.
>
> Where do I get glibc-ports-2.12-2 ?
> And what do the 8 characters at the end signify?
>
> Gordan
>
> On 08/05/2011 01:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@bobich.net
> > <mailto:gordan@bobich.net>> wrote:
> >
> >       On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:42:19 +0100, Peter Robinson
> >     <pbrobinson@gmail.com <mailto:pbrobinson@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >      > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gordan Bobic  wrote:
> >      >   Hi,
> >      >
> >      >   Are the patches for F13 glibc to make it work on ARM available
> >      >   somewhere? I noticed that F13-ARM ships with 2.12-4, but primary
> >      > F13
> >      >   ships with 2.12-1 which was updated to 2.12.2-1. Where are the
> >      > patches
> >      >   from 2.12-1 to 2.12-4 for ARM? I found this page:
> >      >
> >      >
> >     http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Packages_needing_patching
> >      > [2]
> >      >   but it only lists F12 packages, the F13 section is empty.
> >      >
> >      >   The reason I'm asking is because I'm building RHEL6 for ARM, and
> >      > glibc
> >      >   is one off the packages that don't build. Build fails with armv5tel
> >      > not
> >      >   supported. I can see in the F13 spec file that the only arm
> >      > specific
> >      >   patch applied is tzupdate2.patch, with a couple of ARM specific
> >      > compile
> >      >   options and suchlike, I just wanted to make sure there is nothing
> >      > else
> >      >   I'm missing.
> >      >
> >      > In the srpm?
> >
> >       Yes, as I said, I saw the spec file in the srpm, and the only thing I
> >       can see there is the tzupdate2.patch, but that doesn't explain the gap
> >       between 2.12-1 and 2.12-4. My concern is that there may be ARM
> >     specific
> >       fixes between those versions, and primary F13 never appears to have
> >       shipped with 2.12-4.
> >
> >
> > It is basically just that, possibly some changes to the spec file itself
> > as well from memory when I looked at it. diffing against mainline will
> > tell you that. The fixes for F-13 weren't accepted upstream, the ones
> > for F-14 were less bad but I think F-15 will have something that's
> > acceptable to upstream.
> >
> > Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list
> arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm