[fedora-arm] Re: EspressoBin and systemd
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Timothy Krantz
<tkrantz(a)stahurabrenner.com> wrote:
Hi,
I know the espressobin is not a currently supported board. That being
said, I am happily running a Fedora 27 root filesystem on one with a self
compiled kernel.
I've had reports it works fine with standard Fedora kernel on F-28, my
guess your missing something in your kernel but as it's extremely hard
to debug custom kernels and you've given no details as to what kernel
etc your using my guess is your missing a kernel feature that systemd
needs.
The remaining thing we need for support for F-28 is a sane u-boot that
supports uEFI, it's on my list to look at but I've not had time and
I'm awaiting the next release of the Marvel ATF which is apparently
due "soon".
> Fedora 28 root filesystem halts at boot with system freezing execution.
>
> Fedora rawhide boots ok.
>
> Looking into differences between 28 and rawhide I see the following:
>
> Fedora rawhide
>
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --version
>
> systemd 238
>
> +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP
> +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN
> +PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid
>
> ls -l /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1735840 May 11 07:05 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
>
> dnf list systemd
>
> Installed Packages
>
> systemd.aarch64 238-8.git0e0aa59.fc29 @updates
>
>
> Fedora 28
>
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --version
>
> systemd 238
>
> +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP
> +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN
> +PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid
>
> ls -l /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1735240 May 11 07:08 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd
>
> dnf list systemd
>
> systemd.aarch64 238-8.git0e0aa59.fc28 @updates
>
> Which looks pretty darn similar to me, down to the git revision.
>
> So, I am wondering where I would begin to look as to why one works and one
> fails (on the espressobin).
>
> Would I grab the source RPM’s and see if there is a difference in compiler
> flags? Or maybe just a difference in compiler versions?
>
> Is it likely that the Fedora 28 version actually has a patch or patches that
> are not yet in
> rawhidhttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690e?
>
> Is there any chance that this issue is related to this debian issue :
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690
>
> Thanks for any input. This is NOT a big problem for me.
>
> Tim Krantz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list -- arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org...
>