On 12/29/2010 10:39 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
>> The plan is to finish 13, do 14, then 15. As I believe some
or most of
>> the bugs if they are getting pushed upstream should be worked out.?
> The point I was making was that by the time we report bugs to the
> mainline Fedora, the version of Fedora we are reporting against is
> already EOL-ed, because there is such a huge gap betwen a Fedora release
> becoming available for x86 and the ARM rootfs (not even a complete port)
> being available.
>
> This typically means the bugs immediately get marked as WONTFIX with a
> note saying "check the latest release and raise a new bug against that"
> - which we can't do because we're too far behind in the ARM land.
>
Fedora 12 is what's currently available, from a previous ARM port
effort. It's not supported anymore. The ARM SIG is targeting F13 (now
bootable:
http://paulfedora.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fedora-13-arm-alpha-root-file-...)
and onward.
It seems the metadata is broken on some of the packages in the F13 koji
repository. The URLs list a host as "hongkong" which is clearly not
going to resolve. Any chance of a fix? The packages in question are
pretty important for a usable build system.
Gordan