El Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:43:17 +0000
Gordan Bobic <gordan(a)bobich.net> escribió:
On 01/01/2012 01:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:26:00 -0700
> <webwillow(a)thewebwillow.com> escribió:
>> As i have come across the builds of rpm's in koji i noticed that
>> some packages have something like dist_0.src.rpm or dist_1.src.rpm
>> instead if dist.src.rpm. This causes koji to spit them out due to
>> version mismatch errors, how is this addressed by the fedora team?
>> Do ou have to modify the main tag or?
>
> we make the srpms from a git checkout on primary arches. %{?dist} is
> set to whats expected inside the buildroot used to make the srpms.
> the srpms we feed into secondary arches have matching fedora-release
> installed and get the right values. without specifics about what
> your talking about or doing there is no way to help you.
I believe what Don is talking about is that some src.rpm packages are
called dist_<number>.src.rpm instead of dist.<number>.src.rpm, and
what we have found is that koji seems to choke on this. But if you:
rpm -ivh mypackage-1.2.3.dist_1.src.rpm
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
rpmbuild -bs mypackage.spec
you end up with mypackage-1.2.3.dist.1.src.rpm
If you feed the original file with the underscore to koji, it chokes
on it. If you feed it the newly generated src.rpm with the . in the
name instead of _, it works fine.
What Don and I are wondering about is where did these _ named
packages come from and why.
im guessing then your talking about rhel rpms. the dist value would be
set to whats in the srpm at its build time.
Dennis