Andrew Haley wrote:
On 24/05/11 19:39, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 06:37 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
>> Have a look at this too:
>> It was supposed to be the way forward regarding all this. Last I
>> checked, it was only for applications, not libraries, though.
> I was under the impression that OpenSSL is a lot more prolific
> it has more application level support, of the ones listed on the
> page above, at least the following:
Perhaps, but its licence seems to be broken, so it can't be used as a
general-purpose crypto library for Fedora.
This doesn't seem to prevent it from being used as such, as far as I can