F13 Beta 3, at least at http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/beta/f13-arm-2011-05-10/f13-arm/arm/o... has fedora-release-13-1.2.beta2.noarch.rpm but presumably this should be beta3.
Looking at the /etc/yum.repos.d/*repo files in that package, they not surprisingly point to http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/beta/f13-arm-2011-03-23/f13-arm/arm/o... which are the Beta 2 packages.
Presumably, if Beta 3 is installed, then any additional packages installed via yum will pull in the Beta 2 packages.
The only packages that I have installed on Beta2 that are upgraded in Beta3 are thte gcc suite and perl-version. I intend to edit the /etc/yum.repos.d/* files to point to the new location and install them; presumably that's an easy way to get to Beta3.
Hope this make sense, Quentin Armtitage.
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 22:42 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote:
The only packages that I have installed on Beta2 that are upgraded in Beta3 are thte gcc suite and perl-version. I intend to edit the /etc/yum.repos.d/* files to point to the new location and install them; presumably that's an easy way to get to Beta3.
I was wrong about perl-version having been updated. Both Beta2 and Beta3 have two versions of the package in the repos, which is what confused me: perl-version-0.80-112.fc13.armv5tel and perl-version-0.82-1.fc13.armv5tel.
Is it intentional that both packages are in the repos?
Quentin Armitage