On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Donald T Gullett <
Niels de Vos <devos@...> writes:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Peter Robinson
> <pbrobinson@...> wrote:
> >> The glibc issue is interesting... it seems its a regression from F-13,
> >> we had to apply a patch for F-13 but even with all that in place I
> >> still get some failures. So it seems to be a regression (and we're
> >> seeing it on the F-15 glibc one as well. I'll do some more testing and
> >> follow up with the logs etc so that someone more smart than I am might
> >> be able to comment and assist
> >> All help and feedback welcome :-D
> I've managed to build the F14 glibc on F13:
> - https://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96723
All the core OS has been done. We're now looking at the rest of the OS. IE
desktops (gnome/kde/xfce), dev environments (haskell/mono/java etc).
> If someone finds some time to test, please leave a note in
or on this list. If
> there are any issues, I'll try to have a look at them.
I have noticed that forward movement for F14 and or F15 for the armv5tel
had much attention and that the focus is moving torward the newer boards. I
would like greatly to be able to provide some help in this area and if some
one contacted me, I would love to ask many questions and provide hours of
compile and research time to provide a footfs for F14 and or F15 :)
What Constitutes a F14-F15 build over F12?
What Packages denotes a fedora build?
What Design Denotes a fedora build?
Exactly the same as an upstream mainline F-14 release. At the moment we're
concentrating on the gold release which packages tagged with dist-f14 as
opposed to updates.
I have a few sheevaplugs and I am currently running F12 with kernel
Have you not tried the F-13 betas on any of them yet?