interesting uptime...

[DJ Delorie]

Brendan though the list would find this interesting.  This is one of
the first armv7hl builds (F15) we did for fedora, well over a year
ago.  The server (a trimslice) is still up, still running, and still
being used.

$ uptime
 20:42:48 up 518 days,  1:23,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05

$ uname -a
Linux geda-project.org 2.6.41.6-1.fc15.armv7hl.tegra #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Dec 24 17:30:09
UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux

[Josh Boyer]

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:46 PM, DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Brendan though the list would find this interesting.  This is one of
>  the first armv7hl builds (F15) we did for fedora, well over a year
>  ago.  The server (a trimslice) is still up, still running, and still
>  being used.
>
>  $ uptime
>   20:42:48 up 518 days,  1:23,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05
>
>  $ uname -a
>  Linux geda-project.org 2.6.41.6-1.fc15.armv7hl.tegra #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Dec 24 17:30:09
> UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux 
That 2.6.41 makes my eyes bleed.  I hope your using this as a honeypot
if it's publicly accessible...  the number of CVEs fixed in the kernel
since then is rather long.

josh

[Peter Robinson]

> > Brendan though the list would find this interesting.  This is one
> of
> > the first armv7hl builds (F15) we did for fedora, well over a year
> > ago.  The server (a trimslice) is still up, still running, and still
> > being used.
> >
> > $ uptime
> >  20:42:48 up 518 days,  1:23,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.05
> >
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux geda-project.org 2.6.41.6-1.fc15.armv7hl.tegra #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Dec 24
> 17:30:09 UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
>
>  That 2.6.41 makes my eyes bleed.  I hope your using this as a honeypot
>  if it's publicly accessible...  the number of CVEs fixed in the kernel
>  since then is rather long. 
Not to mention that F-15 on armv7 was a terrible hacked up mess that
does worse than bleeding eyes ;-)

Cool stats from the HW side of things though