[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

[Paul Whalen]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
   At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:
Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting. 

More information available at:
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.o...


Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org//calendar//meeting/1936/

[Robert Moskowitz]

On 03/01/2015 10:00 AM, pwhalen(a)redhat.com wrote:
>  Dear all,
>
>  You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>      Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
>      At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net
>
>  The meeting will be about:
>  Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
>
>  More information available at:
>
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.o...
I went there and then looked at:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Planning/Primary

I know everyone is busy, on things that I would like to see done. But I 
think it does all of your hard work a disservice that this is so dated.

Maybe even just a disclaimer at the top that it reflects the thinking 
back during F17, and now we have moved well beyond it with F21/22.

>  Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org//calendar//meeting/1936/

[Peter Robinson]

> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >     Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to
> > 16:00:00 UTC
> >     At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net
> >
> > The meeting will be about:
> > Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
> >
> > More information available at:
> >
> >
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.o...
>
>
>  I went there and then looked at:
>
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Planning/Primary
>
>  I know everyone is busy, on things that I would like to see done. But I
>  think it does all of your hard work a disservice that this is so dated.
>
>  Maybe even just a disclaimer at the top that it reflects the thinking back
>  during F17, and now we have moved well beyond it with F21/22. 
Robert, it's dated because ARMv7 has been primary since F-20 and hence
the document is ancient history and there for historical purposes
only. aarch64 is secondary but unrelated to the link above.

[Robert Moskowitz]

On 03/02/2015 09:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >>      Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2015-03-03 from 15:00:00 to
> >> 16:00:00 UTC
> >>      At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net
> >>
> >> The meeting will be about:
> >> Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting.
> >>
> >> More information available at:
> >>
> >>
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.o...
> >
> > I went there and then looked at:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Planning/Primary
> >
> > I know everyone is busy, on things that I would like to see done. But I
> > think it does all of your hard work a disservice that this is so dated.
> >
> > Maybe even just a disclaimer at the top that it reflects the thinking back
> > during F17, and now we have moved well beyond it with F21/22.
>  Robert, it's dated because ARMv7 has been primary since F-20 and hence
>  the document is ancient history and there for historical purposes
>  only. aarch64 is secondary but unrelated to the link above. 
I understand it is
ancient history, but it is linked in as if it were 
current.  I got there from:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM

Under the 'Planning' topic.

So you know it is ancient history.  I know it is ancient history. 
Someone new will be thrown off by it.

But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to 
getting things working.

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 2 March 2015 at 08:04, Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com&gt; wrote:

>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM
>
>  Under the 'Planning' topic.
>
>  So you know it is ancient history.  I know it is ancient history. Someone
>  new will be thrown off by it.
>
>  But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to
>  getting things working.
>
>
>  
It is a wiki. If you notice a problem, you have the power to fix it. If
people don't like the fix, they can undo it.



>  _______________________________________________
>  arm mailing list
>  arm(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
>  


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

[Paul Whalen]

----- Original Message -----
>  
>  
>  
>  On 2 March 2015 at 08:04, Robert Moskowitz < rgm(a)htt-consult.com > wrote:
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  https://fedoraproject.org/ wiki/Architectures/ARM
>  
>  Under the 'Planning' topic.
>  
>  So you know it is ancient history. I know it is ancient history. Someone new
>  will be thrown off by it.
>  
>  But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to getting
>  things working.
>  
>  
>  
>  It is a wiki. If you notice a problem, you have the power to fix it. If
>  people don't like the fix, they can undo it.
>  
>   
Yes, please feel free to edit where needed! I've added a note at the top for now.

Paul

[Robert Moskowitz]

On 03/02/2015 10:46 AM, Paul Whalen wrote:
>  ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > On 2 March 2015 at 08:04, Robert Moskowitz < rgm(a)htt-consult.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/ wiki/Architectures/ARM
> >
> > Under the 'Planning' topic.
> >
> > So you know it is ancient history. I know it is ancient history. Someone new
> > will be thrown off by it.
> >
> > But that is my take, and I know how documenting takes second place to getting
> > things working.
> >
> >
> >
> > It is a wiki. If you notice a problem, you have the power to fix it. If
> > people don't like the fix, they can undo it.
> >
> >
>  Yes, please feel free to edit where needed! I've added a note at the top for now.
I am reading what it takes to be able to edit this wiki.  Something 
about FAS account. I am assuming I do not have one.  I do have a bugs 
account, but I read that is not an FAS account.  So perhaps sometime 
today, or so, I will get this done.

I *Did* tell Peter that I would at least document what is working for me 
with my Cubie boards.  Somewhere on the wiki...