October 2017 - Atomic Working Group (ARCHIVED)

[atomic-wg] Issue #370: add component in bugzilla for our container base images
by Dusty Mabe 26 Oct '17

26 Oct '17

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We need a place for people to be able to report issues against the container base images. I'm thinking it should be under the *Fedora Container Images* product with a component matching the container base image names. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/370

1 0

Fedora Atomic WG meeting minues
by Josh Berkus 25 Oct '17

25 Oct '17

Minutes here: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-25/atomic_wg.201… Full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-25/atomic_wg.201… -- -- Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #367: Add requirement to have a test description for FLIBS submissions
by Josh Berkus 25 Oct '17

25 Oct '17

jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Until we get a tool to which submitters can submit automated tests, we should add a requirement to have a narrative test description for each container submission. This spares the reviewer from having to figure out how to test images for software he/she may be unfamiliar with. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/367

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #361: The Future of AutoCloud
by Adam Miller 25 Oct '17

25 Oct '17

maxamillion reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` In the Fedora RelEng Tools Backlog meeting, we were discussing various [AutoCloud tickets](https://taiga.fedorainfracloud.org/project/acarter-fedora-docker-a…, which are all kind of in a state of flux since the future of AutoCloud is unknown. I would like to get an answer from the WG what the ongoing commitment is there and if these work items are things that RelEng should care about. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/361

3 5

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting
by dusty＠dustymabe.com 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Atomic Working Group Weekly Meeting on 2017-10-25 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the meeting for the Fedora Atomic Working Group. We typically go over previous meeting action items and then cover all tickets with the meeting keyword: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic_WG#Meetings](https://fedoraproject.or… Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/6952/

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #300: bodhi creating ostrees using pungi
by Dusty Mabe 20 Oct '17

20 Oct '17

The status of the issue: `bodhi creating ostrees using pungi` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/300

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #300: bodhi creating ostrees using pungi
by Dusty Mabe 20 Oct '17

20 Oct '17

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Randy, Patrick and Adam were able to push this through in https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1900. This is in stage now and will move to prod hopefully very soon. Closing this ticket. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/300

1 0

Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-10-18
by Dusty Mabe 19 Oct '17

19 Oct '17

summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-18/fedora_atomic… full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-18/fedora_atomic… =================================== #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg =================================== Meeting started by dustymabe at 17:02:33 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-18/fedora_atomic… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (dustymabe, 17:02:35) * previous meeting action items (dustymabe, 17:05:54) * ACTION: jberkus to follow up on images from Flock container workshop (dustymabe, 17:09:23) * ACTION: jberkus to follow up on docs from Flock workshop (dustymabe, 17:09:35) * ACTION: jberkus to raise kube installation issues with openshift installer team (dustymabe, 17:09:45) * ACTION: dustymabe to update the rolling release plan with info about f27ah (dustymabe, 17:11:21) * LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/349#comment-472028 (dustymabe, 17:11:54) * ACTION: jbrooks to email fedora-devel with issue of needed deps for asciibinder container (dustymabe, 17:13:32) * ACTION: strigazi to do some testing around upgrades from f26 to f27 with kubernetes (dustymabe, 17:18:58) * ACTION: davdunc to blog AWS MP availability of FAH/Cloud. (dustymabe, 17:19:06) * re-evaluate atomic working group meeting time (dustymabe, 17:19:35) * LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/346 (dustymabe, 17:19:41) * ACTION: dustymabe to make new doodle with top 3 or 4 possible times and have people re-vote (dustymabe, 17:23:57) * The Future of AutoCloud (dustymabe, 17:24:46) * LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/361 (dustymabe, 17:24:52) * LINK: https://upstreamfirst.fedorainfracloud.org/ (maxamillion, 17:30:09) * LINK: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/compose (dustymabe, 17:30:31) * While autocloud has served us well in the past we don't have anyone working on new features for it and if it were to need serious maintainence we'd probably have trouble managing it. The Fedora CI pipeline (from the Fedora CI objective) should provide feature parity with Autocloud in the future and we should leverage that pipeline as soon as it does. This can eventually become our (dustymabe, 17:40:15) * Decide strategy for including container runtimes in Atomic Host (dustymabe, 17:43:09) * LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/360 (dustymabe, 17:43:15) * LINK: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/master/.travis.yml#L13 (walters, 17:47:50) * open floor (dustymabe, 18:03:34) Meeting ended at 18:05:50 UTC. Action Items ------------ * jberkus to follow up on images from Flock container workshop * jberkus to follow up on docs from Flock workshop * jberkus to raise kube installation issues with openshift installer team * dustymabe to update the rolling release plan with info about f27ah * jbrooks to email fedora-devel with issue of needed deps for asciibinder container * strigazi to do some testing around upgrades from f26 to f27 with kubernetes * davdunc to blog AWS MP availability of FAH/Cloud. * dustymabe to make new doodle with top 3 or 4 possible times and have people re-vote Action Items, by person ----------------------- * davdunc * davdunc to blog AWS MP availability of FAH/Cloud. * dustymabe * dustymabe to update the rolling release plan with info about f27ah * dustymabe to make new doodle with top 3 or 4 possible times and have people re-vote * jberkus * jberkus to follow up on images from Flock container workshop * jberkus to follow up on docs from Flock workshop * jberkus to raise kube installation issues with openshift installer team * jbrooks * jbrooks to email fedora-devel with issue of needed deps for asciibinder container * **UNASSIGNED** * strigazi to do some testing around upgrades from f26 to f27 with kubernetes People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * dustymabe (136) * jberkus (39) * jbrooks (28) * dwalsh (24) * maxamillion (20) * ashcrow (15) * walters (14) * zodbot (13) * tflink (8) * ttomecek (3) * davdunc (2) * kushal (1) * gholms (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #302: F26s will not provision on Azure
by Dusty Mabe 18 Oct '17

18 Oct '17

The status of the issue: `F26s will not provision on Azure` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/302

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #302: F26s will not provision on Azure
by Dusty Mabe 18 Oct '17

18 Oct '17

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` :beers: - closing this ticket `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/302

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Atomic Working Group (ARCHIVED) October 2017