August 2017 - Atomic Working Group (ARCHIVED)

[atomic-wg] Issue #205: Move memcached container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit
by Dusty Mabe 25 Aug '17

25 Aug '17

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @phracek @eslobodo - thanks! I don't see this container actually being released. [Today's release](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/atomic@lists.fedorap… didn't include it. Have you built the container in the fedora infrastructure? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/205

1 0

Announce: Fedora Layered Image Release
by Adam Miller 25 Aug '17

25 Aug '17

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #205: Move memcached container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit
by Petr Hracek 25 Aug '17

25 Aug '17

phracek added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Yes, issue can be closed. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/205

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #205: Move memcached container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit
by Eliska Slobodova 25 Aug '17

25 Aug '17

eslobodo added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/memcached Here is our take at memcached, so I guess this issue can be closed. CC @phracek `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/205

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #314: tracking open BZs against Fedora Rawhide Atomic Host
by Micah Abbott 25 Aug '17

25 Aug '17

miabbott reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` There were a few BZs that I opened or commented on, which affect Fedora Rawhide Atomic Host (mostly related to 'selinux-policy'): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451379 SELinux is preventing unix_chkpwd from using the 'dac_read_search' capabilities. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451380 SELinux is preventing systemd-logind from using the 'dac_read_search' capabilities. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464770 SELinux is preventing sshd from using the 'dac_read_search' capabilities. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474752 docker fails to run containers while crashing in the background https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474890 kernel oops - unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000418 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474940 SELinux is preventing systemd-tmpfile from using the 'dac_read_search' capabilities. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474941 SELinux is preventing sm-notify from using the 'dac_read_search' capabilities. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/314

4 11

[atomic-wg] Issue #312: Enabling CI/CD: Experiment with building Atomic Host out of a module
by Dusty Mabe 25 Aug '17

25 Aug '17

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` This started as an [email](https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-August/msg00002.html) to the atomic-devel list. Moving into a ticket for further discussion and tracking of experimentation of building Atomic Host out of a module. Summary of bullets from the email: Here are some of the things we want to be able to do: - 1 Have a rigorous definition (including specific versions, buildroot) of what goes into an Atomic Host, including dependencies. - 2 Triggering the CI/CD pipeline based on a change to definition of what goes into Atomic Host. - 3 A way to revert a package in the Atomic Host compose to an earlier version. - 4 A place to store higher level tests along with rigorous definition of Atomic Host, including them being versioned. - 5 Landing multiple changes that need to land together to pass testing. Out of that list we think we require that: - 1R The definition of what is composed into Atomic Host artifacts should include specific versions of packages, and all dependencies included. - 2R The definition of what is composed in an Atomic Host should be stored in a git repository so that changes can be detected easily. The CI/CD pipeline can be triggered off of changes to this reposiroty. - 3R A mechanism to make a future composed Atomic Host artifact, contain an earlier (in RPM NVR parlance) version of a package. - 4R The high level functional Atomic Host tests should live in the same git repository with the rigorous definition of what goes into an Atomic Host. - 5R A mechanism to tell the CI Pipeline that multiple dist-git repository changes (i.e. multiple changing RPMs) should be built and tested together. Note - @walters also sent [an email](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproj… to a broader audience about modularity and Atomic Host that is worth a read. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/312

3 13

[atomic-wg] Issue #325: atomic host two week release emails don't make it to the atomic-devel list
by Dusty Mabe 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We sent the emails to the list but it doesn't make it there. https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-Aug… You can see my reply to the announcement, but not the announcement itself. https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-Aug… I have added noreply(a)fedoraproject.org to the subscribers to the list but this did not help. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/325

2 3

Fedora Atomic WG Meeting Minutes 2017-08-23
by Jason Brooks 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-23/fedora_atomic… full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-23/fedora_atomic… Meeting summary roll call (jbrooks, 17:00:07) action items from last meeting (jbrooks, 17:02:26) contyk's atomic modularity readme: https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/atomic/blob/master/f/README.md (jbrooks, 17:05:11) msg on atomic-devel list about lunch at flock: https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-Aug… (jbrooks, 17:05:57) Open Floor (jbrooks, 17:07:09) pending release (dustymabe, 17:07:36) https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/324 (jberkus, 17:08:50) open floor (dustymabe, 17:12:44) https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6984 (dustymabe, 17:16:32) https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/asciibinder/ (Drakonis_, 17:22:07) https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/rubygems/rubygems/package/rubygem… (jbrooks, 17:24:03) ACTION: jbrooks to submit asciibinder pkg for review (jbrooks, 17:26:50) ACTION: dusty to send out email about cancel next weeks meeting (dustymabe, 17:36:21) Meeting ended at 17:36:39 UTC (full logs). Action items jbrooks to submit asciibinder pkg for review dusty to send out email about cancel next weeks meeting Action items, by person jbrooks jbrooks to submit asciibinder pkg for review People present (lines said) dustymabe (54) jberkus (35) jbrooks (35) zodbot (14) maxamillion (12) kushal (8) ksinny (6) walters (3) Drakonis_ (2) sayan (1) yzhang (1) Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #315: Need tuned in Fedora Atomic Host
by Scott Dodson 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

sdodson reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` According to @dustymabe tuned is not currently installed on Fedora Atomic Host. OpenShift would like to make use of tuned profiles so we'd like to ensure that it's installed and enabled on atomic host. We're not clear on the best way to deliver openshift specific tuned profiles to atomic host so we'd be interested in hearing if you have suggestions there. If nothing else is presented we'll likely drop them via our install playbooks. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/315

5 15

[atomic-wg] Issue #231: clarify meaning of "rolling" for future fedora atomic releases
by Dusty Mabe 22 Aug '17

22 Aug '17

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` created proposal for unified repo: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6984 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/231

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Atomic Working Group (ARCHIVED) August 2017