chrismurphy reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
This is an info bug, not an atomic bug, and it's non-fatal. Open question if upstream should be pushed to fix it or if this is cosmetic.
Background: Btrfs subvolumes can be directly mounted with `mount -o subvol=nameofsubvolume`. Behind the scenes this is a bind mount. When using the mount command or looking at `/proc/self/mountinfo` both subvolid and subvol info is shown.
Example:
`/dev/sda1 on /srv/scratch type btrfs (rw,noatime,seclabel,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=910,subvol=/scratch,x-systemd.automount)`
subvolid=910 is subvol=scratch, those are synonymous and immutable, at least on disk.
Problem: Ostree installations make prolific use of bind mounts for assembly, and I've discovered that mount thinks these bind mounts are subvolumes.
Example:
```
/dev/sda7 on /sysroot type btrfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=258,subvol=/root)
/dev/sda7 on / type btrfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=258,subvol=/root/ostree/deploy/fedora-workstation/deploy/cee1dd51ce63436e3d2e9df8b1759981055c7ac29c78d450217bf684631f0549.0)
/dev/sda7 on /usr type btrfs (ro,relatime,seclabel,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=258,subvol=/root/ostree/deploy/fedora-workstation/deploy/cee1dd51ce63436e3d2e9df8b1759981055c7ac29c78d450217bf684631f0549.0/usr)
/dev/sda7 on /var type btrfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=258,subvol=/root/ostree/deploy/fedora-workstation/var)
```
The first line is correct. subvolid=5 is subvol=root. All the other lines have correct subvolid's but the subvol listed is a bind mount, there is no such subvolume as those listed.
Clearly the kernel code is correctly looking up subvolume ID, but it's assuming bind mounts are subvolumes rather than directly looking them up. Upstream report is here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg67410.html
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/320
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Carried from this mailing list discussion: https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-Jul…
We've had requests from users for btrfs support and we've had several bugs filed where users were trying to configure a system to use btrfs in the installer and it falling flat on it's face. The below list can be updated at any time to include a list of bugs that are releated to atomic ostree/rpm-ostree tech being able to boot on btrfs filesystems and having the installer support it:
- [BZ#1039124](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039124) RFE: Allow /boot on BTRFS, tracker
- [BZ#1415846](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415846) Atomic install boot loader fails with btrfs option
Some of these bugs aren't limited to rpm-ostree/ostree, but also to anaconda and enforced policy within anaconda.
Please add other bugs to this list.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/306
The status of the issue: `kickstarts broken in rawhide - improperly looking for local repo` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/301
summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-09/fedora_atomic…
full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-09/fedora_atomic…
===================================
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg
===================================
Meeting started by dustymabe at 17:00:28 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-09/fedora_atomic…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (dustymabe, 17:00:34)
* previous meeting action items (dustymabe, 17:04:26)
* dusty created https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/311 to track RFE for
rawhide based containers to be made available from
registry.fedoraproject.org (dustymabe, 17:04:52)
* dusty created https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/312 for
experimenting with modularity (dustymabe, 17:05:04)
* dusty created https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/313 for open
questions for modularity team and jbrooks is helping create a list
of questions (dustymabe, 17:05:24)
* ACTION: jberkus strigazi to continue moving kube issues to new
kube-sig tracker (dustymabe, 17:07:33)
* questions for the modularity team (dustymabe, 17:08:06)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/313 (dustymabe, 17:08:16)
* ACTION: jbrooks to look at building a module himself, this will help
us come up with even more questions before our meeting next week
(dustymabe, 17:13:22)
* ACTION: dustymabe to invite petr sabata to the atomic host meeting
next week to answer questions and to present a POC atomic host from
a module (dustymabe, 17:13:47)
* containerized kubernetes in f26 atomic host (dustymabe, 17:16:38)
* ACTION: jbrooks to go through 'remove-kube' tickets and update them
(dustymabe, 17:25:00)
* open floor (dustymabe, 17:28:17)
* LINK:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-Aug…
(dustymabe, 17:29:30)
* ACTION: kushal to create ticket for planning our activities around
FLOCK (dustymabe, 17:31:40)
* LINK:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-Aug…
(dustymabe, 17:31:52)
* maxamillion hopes to get a container release out tomorrow
(dustymabe, 17:37:16)
Meeting ended at 17:39:11 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jberkus strigazi to continue moving kube issues to new kube-sig
tracker
* jbrooks to look at building a module himself, this will help us come
up with even more questions before our meeting next week
* dustymabe to invite petr sabata to the atomic host meeting next week
to answer questions and to present a POC atomic host from a module
* jbrooks to go through 'remove-kube' tickets and update them
* kushal to create ticket for planning our activities around FLOCK
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* dustymabe
* dustymabe to invite petr sabata to the atomic host meeting next week
to answer questions and to present a POC atomic host from a module
* jbrooks
* jbrooks to look at building a module himself, this will help us come
up with even more questions before our meeting next week
* jbrooks to go through 'remove-kube' tickets and update them
* kushal
* kushal to create ticket for planning our activities around FLOCK
* **UNASSIGNED**
* jberkus strigazi to continue moving kube issues to new kube-sig
tracker
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* dustymabe (111)
* maxamillion (41)
* jbrooks (40)
* zodbot (16)
* kushal (7)
* ksinny (6)
* _ari_ (2)
* nzwulfin (1)
* sayan (1)
* bowlofeggs (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Verified the changes hit rawhide. They will hit f26 as soon as we get the anaconda and productimg tested.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/282
dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Add docs on how fedora builds OSTrees.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/pull-request/318