miabbott added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This makes sense to me.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/326
The issue: `Guidelines have LABEL MAINTAINER uppercase examples` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `miabbott` by miabbott.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/328
The issue: `Guidelines have dnf -y install <package>; dnf clean all; instead of using "&&"` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `miabbott` by miabbott.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/329
The issue: `Move tools container image from Fedora-Dockerfiles GitHub into DistGit` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `ttomecek` by ttomecek.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/214
sochotni reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
All labels should be lowercase so this seems like error in the example templates
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/328
terrycloth added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I would expect "rolling release" to mean that the operating system itself has no release version, and instead applications and libraries and things are updated as soon as there's a new, reasonably stable release. As a user, and even as a sysadmin, this seems like a nice way of doing things to me -- there's less need to start over with major OS changes, because updates become smaller, more incremental.
I of course understand that sometimes a piece of software will make backwards-compatibility-breaking changes, and we need a way to let users adapt to those changes. But perhaps instead of discrete distro releases, we could work toward having warnings and a period of time for delaying updates for those particular backward-breaking packages.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/231