dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> Maybe let's open a separate issue for that?
+1 - please open a separate issue.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/282
jlebon added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
So, I'm not sure this should have been closed quite yet. The patches above only changed Anaconda so we do not show locales we don't actually ship. Though the question of whether we should ship all locales either in-tree or through some other mechanism is still open, right? Maybe let's open a separate issue for that?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/282
smilner opened a new pull-request against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Update manual steps for releasing atomic host
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/pull-request/397
dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
f27: manifest: include firewalld in Atomic Host
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/104
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-01-10/fedora_atomic…
full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-01-10/fedora_atomic…
===================================
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_wg
===================================
Meeting started by dustymabe at 16:35:08 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-01-10/fedora_atomic…
.
Meeting summary
- ---------------
* roll call (dustymabe, 16:35:11)
* previous meeting action items (dustymabe, 16:38:26)
* Using buildah in Atomic Host (dustymabe, 16:39:39)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/402 (dustymabe, 16:39:45)
* ACTION: ashcrow to create ticket for actually making a buildah
container in fedora that we can recommend people use to build OCI
images (dustymabe, 16:51:51)
* Overhaul list of members, Quorum Rules (dustymabe, 16:52:16)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/363 (dustymabe, 16:52:25)
* ACTION: sanja to take membership proposal AND voting proposal from
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/363 and add them to the wiki and
close ticket (dustymabe, 16:58:02)
* Decide strategy for including container runtimes in Atomic Host
(dustymabe, 16:58:50)
* LINK: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/360 (dustymabe, 16:58:55)
* ACTION: ashcrow to create issue to specifically discuss adding crio
to atomic host base image (dustymabe, 17:08:40)
* open floor / news (dustymabe, 17:08:56)
Meeting ended at 17:27:44 UTC.
Action Items
- ------------
* ashcrow to create ticket for actually making a buildah container in
fedora that we can recommend people use to build OCI images
* sanja to take membership proposal AND voting proposal from
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/363 and add them to the wiki and
close ticket
* ashcrow to create issue to specifically discuss adding crio to atomic
host base image
Action Items, by person
- -----------------------
* ashcrow
* ashcrow to create ticket for actually making a buildah container in
fedora that we can recommend people use to build OCI images
* ashcrow to create issue to specifically discuss adding crio to
atomic host base image
* sanja
* sanja to take membership proposal AND voting proposal from
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/363 and add them to the wiki and
close ticket
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
- ---------------------------
* dustymabe (132)
* ashcrow (29)
* walters (21)
* zodbot (16)
* sanja (15)
* jberkus (13)
* ksinny (9)
* jbrooks (7)
* unicell (6)
* strigazi (2)
* kushal (1)
* jlebon (1)
* sayan (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xU8b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Currently, we ship docker in the base image for Fedora Atomic Host. With the release of CRI-O, as well as the issues around docker versions, one possible solution is to ship only runc with the base Atomic Host, and make container runtimes installable as system containers. If we don't move docker to a system container, there's a strong argument to also ship CRI-O as part of the base image.
Arguments in favor of System Containers for CRs:
* minimizes the base system image
* helps deal with docker/containerd versioning issues
* doesn't require users to ship container runtimes they don't want
* consistent with our general modularity approach
* puts CRI-O/docker on a separate upgrade cycle, which can help around kube/openshift updates
* allows community to add other runtimes if they want (e.g. Rkt)
Arguments against using System Containers for CRs:
* extra step (or two) for new user startup
* total disk size for atomic + cri-o + docker will actually be larger
* not sure if all things docker work as a system container
* puts docker/CRI-O on a separate upgrade cycle, which could break around kernel updates
Discuss!
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/360
smilner reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Having buildah available in some for for Atomic Host seems to make sense. How should/would we do this? Options include:
- part of the base compose
- as a container itself
- require it be installed via rpm layering
/cc @nalin @dwalsh @sdodson @dustymabe @miabbott
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/402
dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
rawhide: manifest: include firewalld in Atomic Host
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/103
walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
Add ex-jigdo-spec
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/100