On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:13 AM Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Thanks Sinny for running this!! I have some responses to the questions
>> below (and some suggestions) inline:
>>
>> On 04/03/2018 02:10 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>>
>> > ==========================================
>> > #fedora-meeting-1: fedora_atomic_community
>> > ==========================================
>>
>> Might be good if we named this similar to our other meeting, but with
>> APAC in
>> the title: #startmeeting fedora_atomic_wg_apac. And then the Subject of
>> this
>> mail could be "Fedora Atomic WG APAC Meeting Minutes".
>>
>>
>> > Action Items
>> > ------------
>> > * ksinny get answer for "Is there any plan to have a default flatpak
>> > repo eventually ? e.g. flathub, maybe on provided by fedora, etc"
>>
>> I think there is a plan to have a fedora flatpak repo (built from Fedora
>> RPMs) at some point in the future. For now flathub is the way to go.
>>
>>
>>
> Hey Sinny,
>
> yes, we need to have flatpaks enabled by default, eventually, since that
> is the
> preferred way to get desktop apps on an atomic workstation.
>
>
+1
> We are working towards having flatpaks built from rpms inside fedora, which
> will give us a repository we can enable by default without problems. Most
> of
> the code for this has been written, it just takes some time to get it
> deployed
> in production.
>
> We also need the ability to have flatpaks preinstalled on an atomic
> workstation,
> so we can stop including things like firefox in the OS image and use a
> flatpak
> for that instead.
>
> I have created tickets for these issues here:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic-workstation/issue
>
Kudos to all who are working on this! I will follow the updates happening
around it.
>
> Matthias
>
--
http://sinny.io/