dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` In a few previous issues ([1](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/379) [2](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/381) [3](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/383) we had discussed our strategy regarding automated container builds in dockerhub. Now that we have friends with a hosted container registry we should consider pivoting and using quay.io instead.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1
Quay was always the more technically complete registry anyway. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430
gscrivano added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1 from me ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I have no objections. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430
sanja added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` +1 definitely ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/430
atomic@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dusty Mabe -
Giuseppe Scrivano
-
Josh Berkus
-
Sanja Bonic
-
Steve Milner