andreasn reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` The website says "Fedora Atomic", but the uses branding that says "Fedora Cloud" <!!image>
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks for the report we'll try to get the media updated in a future 2 week release. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` request for logos package to include atomic logos in it: https://pagure.io/fedora-logos/issue/3 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
The issue: `Installer doesn't match Fedora Website` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `dustymabe` by dustymabe.
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` upstream fedora-logos issue is fixed: https://pagure.io/fedora-logos/issue/3#comment-486747
should be able to update the productimg rpm soon. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Is it not pulled from ``fedora-logos`` [rpm](https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=fedora-logos)? Or is that a deprecated package that happens to have it's content pulled into the ``product-image-$NAME`` packages? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
Is it not pulled from fedora-logos rpm? Or is that a deprecated package that happens to have it's content pulled into the product-image-$NAME packages?
It is pulled from the fedora-logos rpm, but then that rpm is used as a Buildrequires for the productimg rpm (believe me, i was confused at first too). so we have to get the new fedora-logos rpm and then we can update the productimg rpm to use the new atomic logos. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @spot mind adding a build for the ``fedora-logos`` package? I started to do so but don't have access to that package:
``` Update requested to fix branding for Fedora Atomic Host.
Updates:
- Move CSS for logos in the graphical installer into fedora-logos - create atomic files for anaconda to use (https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385) ``` ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7213#comment-489888
the fix for this should be in the next builds of f27 atomic host. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Officially in Fedora 27 now: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/187354#step/_boot_to_anaconda/3. Will be in the next release. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385
The status of the issue: `Installer doesn't match Fedora Website` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
atomic@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Andreas Nilsson -
Dusty Mabe
-
Steve Milner